Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33223

Re: Object.defineProperties

Path csiph.com!.POSTED.204-73-239-109.cust.centrio.cz!not-for-mail
From Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Object.defineProperties
Date Fri, 5 May 2017 19:37:48 +0200
Organization csiph.com Internet News Service
Message-ID <oeid9d$1ag1$1@csiph.com> (permalink)
References <oebtq0$2611$1@csiph.com> <objects-20170503082342@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <oec3h1$2dav$1@csiph.com> <1943190.NgBsaNRSFp@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Fri, 5 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info csiph.com; posting-host="204-73-239-109.cust.centrio.cz:109.239.73.204"; logging-data="43521"; mail-complaints-to="admin@kev009.com"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To <1943190.NgBsaNRSFp@PointedEars.de>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:33223

Show key headers only | View raw


On 05/05/2017 18:14, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
[...]
>> I use:
>>
>>      function isTypeOf(obj, typeToCheck) {
>>          if (arguments.length < 2) {
>>              return false;
>>          }
>>          return Object.prototype.toString.call(obj).slice(8,
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> -1).toLowerCase() === typeToCheck.toLowerCase();
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>      }
>>
>> which gives me more precisely a type of object.
>
> I hope you have optimized that somewhat.

I can't find a reliable way at the moment. Perhaps I should combine few 
methods, but that might be an overengineering.

>> The Object.defineProperties says about object, but function, array are
>> also objects. That's why:
>>
>>    if (typeof obj !== 'object' || obj === null)
>>      throw new TypeError('bad obj');
>>
>> looks like a bug to me.
>
> typeof [] === "object", so that is OK.  (common misconception)

In a sense of that [] is an object - yes, but I'd prefer to know that 
tested object is in fact an Array type. Operator instanceof looks 
promising, but I need to check it anyway.

> typeof function () {} === "function", so that is not OK in theory; however,
> one might decide that it is not OK to modify function objects.

Functions are objects so they can be extended like any other objects.

-- 
Cezary Tomczyk
http://www.ctomczyk.pl/
https://www.aslint.org/ - Accessibility validation tool

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 08:36 +0200
  Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 10:14 +0200
    Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 10:59 +0200
      Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 12:36 +0200
        Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 18:47 +0200
          Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 18:18 +0200
    Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 18:14 +0200
      Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 19:37 +0200
        Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 20:11 +0200
          Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 15:26 +0200
            Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-06 16:43 +0200
              Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 20:23 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-06 22:21 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 23:19 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 02:40 +0200
            Re: Object.defineProperties Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 22:37 +0200
              Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 23:05 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 00:29 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:06 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 13:17 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 02:37 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 09:42 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 17:11 +0200
                Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 20:08 +0200
        Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 20:59 +0200
          Re: Object.defineProperties John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-06 10:35 +0100
  Re: Object.defineProperties Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 08:32 +0200
  Re: Object.defineProperties Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 18:24 +0200

csiph-web