Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31468
| From | Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: n00b considering Java Script |
| Date | 2016-09-26 23:10 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <nsc2rk$v1h$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <bI6dnZGZ-b0JR3rKnZ2dnUU7-WvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <ZYRFz.3358$z45.29@fx39.iad> <7235541.NyiUUSuA9g@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > <http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/31/11189033/1118903331-15.pdf> > Page 3: > > | JavaScript and the Web > | > | […] > | The organization that sets the standards for web pages is the World Wide > | Web Consortium (W3C). It not only sets standards for HTML and CSS, but > | also for how JavaScript interacts with web pages inside a web browser. > > Utter nonsense. The W3C specifies the Document Object Model (DOM), a > standard of *language-independent* interfaces for interacting with documents > written in markup languages like HTML, which are the primary focus of the > W3C. ECMAScript implementations like JavaScript, among other programming > languages, can then be used to access implementations of those interfaces > and interact with DOM objects. As you like to put it: *wrong!*. In addition to the DOM itself, the W3 also specifies how the DOM interfaces are to be implemented in ECMAScript: <https://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/ecma-script-binding.html> Of course, the cited section still seems to be dated, as the standards are set by the WHATWG nowadays, not the W3. The HTML(5) spec <https://html.spec.whatwg.org> is much more tightly integrated with JavaScript, being the lingua franca of the web there is not much concern for interoperability with other languages. | Some parts of the language described by this specification only | support JavaScript as the underlying scripting language. [JAVASCRIPT] | | Note: The term "JavaScript" is used to refer to ECMA-262, rather than | the official term ECMAScript, since the term JavaScript is more | widely known. Similarly, the MIME type used to refer to JavaScript in | this specification is text/javascript, since that is the most | commonly used type, despite it being an officially obsoleted type | according to RFC 4329. [RFC4329] - Bergi
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
n00b considering Java Script Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 14:09 +0000
Re: n00b considering Java Script WaltS <thalionusa@REMOVEaim.com> - 2016-09-25 11:22 -0400
Re: n00b considering Java Script Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 16:12 +0000
Re: n00b considering Java Script WaltS <thalionusa@REMOVEaim.com> - 2016-09-25 12:33 -0400
Re: n00b considering Java Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-25 18:23 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script WaltS <thalionusa@REMOVEaim.com> - 2016-09-25 12:32 -0400
Re: n00b considering Java Script Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-09-25 19:36 +0100
Re: n00b considering Java Script WaltS <thalionusa@REMOVEaim.com> - 2016-09-25 16:25 -0400
Re: n00b considering Java Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-25 21:23 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-09-26 10:28 +0100
Re: n00b considering Java Script John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-09-26 10:22 +0100
Re: n00b considering Java Script Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2016-09-26 23:10 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:27 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:43 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2016-09-25 23:57 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
Re: n00b considering Java Script Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 01:00 +0000
Re: n00b considering Java Script Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2016-09-26 23:22 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-27 08:18 +0200
Re: n00b considering Java Script John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-09-27 19:12 +0100
Re: n00b considering Java Script Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-30 03:14 +0000
csiph-web