Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31197
| From | $Bill <news@todbe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable |
| Date | 2016-08-28 14:59 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <npvmrs$uac$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <npug18$166s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 08-28-16 03:56, emf wrote:
> In the current JSLint help webpage (http://jslint.com/help.html) it now says:
>
> "Tolerate for statement:
> true if the for statement should be allowed
> It is almost always better to use the array methods instead."
>
> Getting rid of the for loops is a big change. Reflecting on it, however, the for loop is an awkward construction -- it's just something you learn as a matter of fact when you begin and that time on you take it for granted. Instead of
>
> for (var i = 0; i < 10; i += 1) {
> ...
> }
>
> the while loop does seem more straightforward:
>
> var i = 0;
> while (i < 10) {
> ...
> i += 1;
> }
>
> After stopping using for loops, I can imagine a time when I won't be able to understand why I once almost always preferred to use them.
>
> I do not understand, however, the comment about array methods. I seldom find use for them. Can someone explain what Crawford implies??
Anyone that's been a programmer prior to HTML is familiar with the standard C for loop.
Seems more straightforward than the 3-piece while loop you have there.
It's concise, self contained on one line and obvious to any programmer that's been
around a while. Combined with a while and a foreach loop, you have all the looping
constructs you need. Of course there was no object oriented programming at the time
of invention - everything was procedural which could make a difference.
So "Tolerate For == true;"
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JSlint finds for loops intolerable emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 06:56 -0400
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-08-28 14:28 +0200
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 22:35 -0400
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-30 12:11 +0200
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-09-03 20:54 +0200
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-03 23:03 +0000
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-03 22:47 +0000
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Lewis Perin <perin@panix.com> - 2016-08-28 16:50 -0400
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Lewis Perin <perin@panix.com> - 2016-08-28 18:49 -0400
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable Lewis Perin <perin@panix.com> - 2016-08-28 19:13 -0400
Re: JSlint finds for loops intolerable $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-08-28 14:59 -0700
csiph-web