Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30619
| From | "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? |
| Date | 2016-06-02 16:43 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <nipgmv$dae$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <5750271d$0$5837$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <nip9et$h5d$1@solani.org> <575036d4$0$5889$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <nipeap$4db$1@solani.org> <57504110$0$5945$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
On 02.06.2016 at 16:23, R.Wieser wrote: >> Indeed, I should have written "host environment specific". > > ... and even that its doesn't matter in the slightest I'm afraid. > > And it would also be even less usefull as a designation, as "host" can be > used for both an OS, a browser and, with a little bit of will, even for a > webpage ... Well, the ECMAScript specification[1] says: | ECMAScript is an object-oriented programming language for performing | computations and manipulating computational objects within a host | environment. So "host environment specific" seems appropriate. [1] <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-262.pdf> -- Christoph M. Becker
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 09:54 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-06-02 11:21 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 12:18 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-06-02 13:22 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-02 12:38 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 14:32 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-02 14:40 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 15:40 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-02 16:03 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 16:23 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-02 16:43 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-06-02 20:42 +0100
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-06-02 20:44 +0100
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-06-02 20:24 +0700
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-02 16:35 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-03 10:50 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-03 17:35 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-06-03 22:25 +0200
Re: try ... catch for a specific error ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-06-03 23:55 +0200
csiph-web