Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30449

Re: Node.js

Show all headers | View raw

On 16/05/16 16:20, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Tim Slattery wrote:
> 
>> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Are all .js files serverside "executed on server", i want clientside
>>> "browser executed" javascript but i want to split the code/script
>>> over several files, is that possible?
>>
>> All (or nearly all) javascript is shipped to the client and executed
>> there. You can have various chunks of code in various *.js files on
>> the server, so long as the HTML page references all of them.
> 
> There are no “HTML pages” (this is an outdated concept that has always been 
> underdefined at best), and *client-side* script resources can now be loaded 
> *on demand* in a reliable, non-blocking, and standards-compliant way. [1]  
> (If ECMAScript implementations in Web browsers would also implement the 
> “export” and “import” features of ECMAScript 2015, we could be writing 
> script modules and have them loaded implicitly now instead of through 
> RequireJS [2] and similar libraries. [3])
> 
> Since the References header field is borken, presumably because Google 
> Groups borked the Message-ID, I cannot see if and how this pertains to 
> Node.js, which is a *server-side* environment based on Google V8 JavaScript 
> in that regard; Node.js modules are *never* “shipped to the client”. [4]  
> 
> The OP should read the FAQ and learn “How To Ask Questions The Smart Way”.  
> 
> The author of the precursor should read the FAQ, STFW, and update their 
> knowledge base before giving further advice.
> 
> __________
> [1] <https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/scripting-1.html#the-script-element>
> [2] <http://requirejs.org/>
> [3] <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/export>
> [4] <https://nodejs.org/en/>

As always, your daily doze of copypasta plus arrogance is always
appreciated. ;)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-16 08:49 -0700
  Re: Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-16 09:00 -0700
    Re: Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-16 09:19 -0700
      Re: Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-16 09:41 -0700
        Re: Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-16 09:46 -0700
      Re: Node.js Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2016-05-16 12:53 -0400
        Re: Node.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
          Re: Node.js Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-16 18:08 -0400
            Re: Node.js Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-05-16 23:16 +0100
            Re: Node.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-17 08:01 +0200
              Re: Node.js Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-17 16:16 -0400
                Re: Node.js DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-05-18 02:25 +0100
                Re: Node.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-18 20:08 +0200
                Re: Node.js Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-18 14:54 -0400
                Re: Node.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-19 06:55 +0200
          Re: Node.js jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-17 00:35 -0700
            Re: Node.js Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-17 16:51 -0400
    Re: Node.js Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-05-16 20:01 +0200

csiph-web