Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30407
| From | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Can somebody explain this code |
| Date | 2016-05-07 13:02 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ngl3cg$r3d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <3457976.2eFHA4iNFV@PointedEars.de> <nd9ipa$7r2$1@dont-email.me> <2497856.AOaF6Xk2y9@PointedEars.de> <nd9q0f$2h4$1@dont-email.me> <3332181.Nmlc57RfOh@PointedEars.de> |
On 04/05/16 00:51, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Aleksandro wrote:
>
>> On 27/03/16 20:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Aleksandro wrote:
>>>> On 27/03/16 17:44, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>> Aleksandro wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/03/16 16:30, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>>>> var myFunc;
>>>>>>> myFunc = function () { alert("This is my anonymous function"); };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (In that case, “myFunc” is assigned the “undefined” value first.)
>>>>>> Would the VM actually assign undefined first? I doubt it.
>>>>> On what grounds?
>>>> Well, there's a thing called optimization... you know...
>>> Although successive lines, they are not necessarily processed so.
>>
>> But they might.
>
> I am not convinced.
>
> There are at least four points that you are overlooking here:
>
> 1. It was an *example* demonstrating functional equivalence of lines of
> source code.
>
> 2. myFunc = function () { alert("This is my anonymous function"); };
> var myFunc;
>
> is equivalent to the previous code, too.
>
> 3. There can be source code between declaration and assignment, and in the
> assignment, referring to the variable. The value of the variable has to
> be the “undefined” value then.
That is a totally different scenario that will most certainly be
optimized as well.
> 4. There is not only one virtual machine. It need not even *be* a *virtual*
> machine; for example, Google V8 JIT-compiles source code directly into
> machine code.
>
> <https://developers.google.com/v8/design>
And that JIT-compiler can make the same inferences.
> Taking unnecessary risks based on wild guesses and wishful thinking is the
> mark of a wannabe.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can somebody explain this code "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2016-03-23 22:51 +0100
Re: Can somebody explain this code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-24 20:30 +0100
Re: Can somebody explain this code Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-24 20:19 -0300
Re: Can somebody explain this code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 22:44 +0200
Re: Can somebody explain this code Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-27 18:22 -0300
Re: Can somebody explain this code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 01:07 +0200
Re: Can somebody explain this code Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-27 20:26 -0300
Re: Can somebody explain this code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-04 05:51 +0200
Re: Can somebody explain this code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-05-04 08:55 +0200
Re: Can somebody explain this code Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-07 13:02 -0300
csiph-web