Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30172
| From | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: convert a string into a json object, |
| Date | 2016-04-01 16:21 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ndmhi3$kv2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c8134afb-b7f5-4e2d-b3e6-90f8a3594544@googlegroups.com> <json-20160401033220@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ndlcms$ae5$1@news.albasani.net> <style-20160401174212@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <i0ftfbt8uvgeeg9nsn9hqk8496tmn647pp@4ax.com> |
On 01/04/16 15:21, John Harris wrote:
> On 1 Apr 2016 16:45:59 GMT, ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:
>
>> Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> writes:
> <snip>
>>> Off-topic... does anymody else find it counter-intuitive when most of the
>>> variables are declared as "const"? I've seen this style recently in many
>>> places, and it's technically correct, but for some reason I find it irritating.
>>
>> These /are/ constants because they are not assigned to after
>> their initializations. I deem it most readable to declare
>> constants with »const« and not with »let«. Because it /is/
>> a constant, it also should be /declared/ to be a constant.
>
> The code contained
> const result = {};
> and
> result[i]= person;
>
> The constant result is not what I would call a constant. You've
> updated it.
Constant is the object it references, it's address, the pointer,
whatever underlies.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
convert a string into a json object, JRough <janis.rough@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 19:12 -0700
Re: convert a string into a json object, Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:42 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, JRough <janis.rough@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 17:32 -0700
Re: convert a string into a json object, Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:49 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-04-01 19:21 +0100
Re: convert a string into a json object, Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-04-01 16:21 -0300
Re: convert a string into a json object, Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-04-01 20:36 +0100
Re: convert a string into a json object, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-02 04:07 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-04-02 12:07 -0300
Re: convert a string into a json object, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-02 17:36 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-04-02 21:01 -0300
Re: convert a string into a json object, Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-04-02 20:40 +0000
Re: convert a string into a json object, Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:18 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-04-02 11:29 +0100
Re: convert a string into a json object, Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-04-02 20:30 +0000
Re: convert a string into a json object, JRough <janis.rough@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 11:32 -0700
Re: convert a string into a json object, Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 00:51 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-04-02 12:03 -0300
Re: convert a string into a json object, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-02 03:48 +0200
Re: convert a string into a json object, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-02 04:25 +0200
csiph-web