Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28462
| From | "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM |
| Date | 2015-07-21 20:35 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mom3ak$mcb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <4b1cb0ba-f0b0-4b25-a1aa-692c30e69833@googlegroups.com> <mol6so$48v$1@dont-email.me> <1625412.DiW0shChWm@PointedEars.de> <molf6c$2l1$1@dont-email.me> <1516357.lIjpcpmlPf@PointedEars.de> |
Il 07/21/2015 04:05 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ha scritto: > danca (Daniele Campagna) wrote: > ... >> please don't take early deductions. A smile is just a smile, >> referred to this old quarrel about "Javascript", and in no way >> irrespective of you or your recognized knowledge. > > (You mean “disrespectful”, I presume.) ACK. > Esatto. [OT] > >> And so am I, then "absit injuria risis"! > > That would probably be «rīsū» (ablative, for “concerning the smile”; > cf. «verbum»). > I made my best to forget Latin and Old Greek, so I am very rusty about it. I mimicked the sentence "absit injuria verbis" and I treated "risus" as "verbum" but it is wrong, "verbum" being II declination and "risus" IV. Oops. Probably correct is: "absit injuria risibus". :-) Latin did not use a singular (as we do in modern languages) to mean a plurality, IIRC. >> >> With due respect, a recursive algorythm hardly demonstrates flawed >> logic, I think [if it works]. > > The flawed "logic" is the one that is based on the claim that the recursive > algorithm would be “logically correct” in this case. That appears to me to > be self-evident as the recursive algorithm can fail while the iterative one > can *never* fail under the same circumstances. And as for “clear and > elegant”, beauty lies in the eye of the beholder; it has nothing to do with > logic. > Nevertheless logic has its own beauty, even if not all the people can perceive it. Descartes has been contradicted, and his famous sentence is maybe wrong, but remains "clear and elegant". [/OT] Dan -- "Everybody should pay taxes with a smile" I tried, but they want money.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-15 09:59 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-15 11:59 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-15 12:03 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-15 13:36 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-19 12:27 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-19 12:34 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-21 12:08 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-25 14:11 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-25 21:22 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-27 16:12 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-08-08 04:50 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-08 09:33 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-08-12 00:48 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-12 01:18 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-08-13 23:26 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 08:48 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-08-20 02:11 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 15:59 -0700
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-21 12:30 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-21 13:53 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-21 14:51 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-21 16:05 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-21 20:35 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 22:10 -0700
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-08-06 10:07 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-06 20:15 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-08-08 01:21 +0200
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 22:09 -0700
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 03:04 +0000
Re: Recursive function to find a node in the DOM "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-08-06 10:20 +0200
csiph-web