Re: Expression for the global object

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Expression for the global object
Date	Sat, 30 May 2015 11:23:55 -0300
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	34
Message-ID	<mkch5q$vhp$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<JavaScript-20150528222318@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <645d86ba-2299-4371-bb64-90dae6df316a@googlegroups.com> <1442639.SsZ0RATE5U@PointedEars.de> <79b520ed-6efe-4064-a9cf-ea66c60f00df@googlegroups.com> <12824458.XGgQv3ng7H@PointedEars.de> <36af7f41-d441-48a2-81a1-28e16e063e54@googlegroups.com> <1568146.gjZlAL6gd7@PointedEars.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host	OsjKjz7AuNrX651V1sABXg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:27929

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas Lahn wrote:
> Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
>
>> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> | [[Scope]]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> [...] This scope is obviously "without "use strict"".  [...]
>>
>> We need to be clear and consistent in terminology then. "scope" vs
>> "[[Scope]]"
>
> I fail to see a difference.
>

>
>> Following the same vein regarding "use strict";
>
> "in scope" is a necessary, but not a sufficient criterion.
>
> You can never be sure that your code is only executed in the global context,
> and the global context always can enforce strict mode.  In fact, it is
> reasonable to assume that it is not, because of the side effects and of the
> prevalence of the module pattern.
>
> It is not logical to use approaches that make code less compatible than it
> needs to be.
>

Mr. Spock states: "Any show of resistance would be futile."

-- 
Joao Rodrigues

Thread

Re: Expression for the global object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-05-28 13:49 -0700
  Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-28 22:59 +0200
    Re: Expression for the global object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-05-29 07:24 -0700
      Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-29 17:24 +0200
        Re: Expression for the global object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-05-30 06:07 -0700
          Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-30 15:20 +0200
            Re: Expression for the global object Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-30 11:23 -0300
              Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-30 19:05 +0200
  Re: Expression for the global object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-29 15:30 +1000
    Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-29 12:25 +0100
      Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-29 13:33 +0200
        Re: Expression for the global object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-29 21:50 +1000
          Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-29 14:57 +0100
            Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-31 16:18 +0200
  Re: Expression for the global object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-05-29 07:31 -0700
    Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-30 15:25 +0200
  Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-30 18:56 +0200

csiph-web