Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12642

Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:37:50 +0100
Organization Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
Lines 27
Message-ID <m2y5r4ive9.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> (permalink)
References <7577204.4705.1331535049931.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> <2455587.J1nglo7zMT@PointedEars.de> <2UVL3KD5nyXPFw5i@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD>
Reply-To ebednarz@gmx.net
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net Zsrv9peDjo7S4y5AhlyFBQTh9EYtOsCCyQ3+TKBf7ARL4y+BKV
Cancel-Lock sha1:5NwedVpWuLINY47GRkGtD8SwVKw= sha1:dX6eHDzTcXfbuBU0NqDV9GX1IDA=
X-Eric-Conspiracy There is no conspiracy
User-Agent Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin)
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:12642

Show key headers only | View raw

John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes:

> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 at 00:03:13, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>
>   <snip>
>>There is no "javascript", that is a common misconception.
>   <snip>
>
> Is there anyone else who agrees with Thomas ?

| JavaScript
|    Some parts of the language described by this specification only
|    support JavaScript as the underlying scripting language. [ECMA262]
|
|    Note: The term "JavaScript" is used to refer to ECMA262, rather than
|    the official term ECMAScript, since the term JavaScript is more
|    widely known. Similarly, the MIME type used to refer to JavaScript
|    in this specification is text/javascript, since that is the most
|    commonly used type, despite it being an officially obsoleted type
|    according to RFC 4329. [RFC4329]
<http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#dependencies>

That calls for a drink.

-- 
λ

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine R Hall <richkhall@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 23:50 -0700
  Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-12 07:59 +0000
  Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-13 00:03 +0100
    Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:05 +0000
      Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-13 12:37 +0100
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 16:24 +0000
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:55 +0100
      Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 09:03 -0700
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 10:53 -0700
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 12:36 -0700
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 19:07 -0700
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 22:43 -0700
            Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:09 -0700
              Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 12:53 -0700
              Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 13:30 -0700
                Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 15:42 -0700
                Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 17:32 -0700
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 14:04 -0700
            Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:40 +0100
      Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-15 14:20 -0700
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 17:28 +0000
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-16 10:53 -0700
            Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 17:00 +0000
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-17 12:05 +0100
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 10:24 -0700
      Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-16 19:39 -0600
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 18:54 -0700
        Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 16:53 +0000
          Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-17 13:10 -0600
            Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 13:06 +0000

csiph-web