Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26037
| From | Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Dynamically assign image map values? |
| Date | 2014-10-30 09:44 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <m2stp7$79g$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <m2q89q$c5m$1@dont-email.me> <m2qkt1$reb$1@news.albasani.net> <m2rbk4$a71$1@news.albasani.net> <m2rjvi$r6c$1@news.albasani.net> <m2sjla$i2j$1@dont-email.me> |
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > 2014-10-29 22:50, Tuxedo wrote: > > > One difference I notice is that MAP->AREA appears at the end of the BODY > > node instead of at the beginning and before the IMG element, as in the > > static HTML version, below, when in the DOM Inspector's tree view. > > It does not matter where you place the MAP element, since it has no > visible content, only AREA elements that declare areas of an image > > >> .. as if the following would have existed in static HTML to begin with: > >> > >> <map name="mymap"> > >> <area shape="rect" coords="100,100,300,300" href="bla"> > >> </map> > >> <img src="mymap.jpg" id="hello" usemap="#mymap"> > > That, or these elements in the opposite order, is the normal setup, but > it's just a natural and convenient way - keeping the functionally > related elements together, even though they technically need not appear > that way. > Thanks for the clarification. Tuxedo
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-29 08:47 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-29 10:25 +0200
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-29 13:00 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-29 19:28 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-29 21:50 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-30 07:51 +0200
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-30 09:44 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-30 18:35 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-30 19:57 +0200
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-30 19:46 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-30 20:57 +0200
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-30 21:26 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-30 22:58 +0200
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-30 20:52 +0100
Re: Dynamically assign image map values? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-10-30 22:23 +0200
csiph-web