Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #13226

Re: question on scope in callback

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: question on scope in callback
References <b991d3b3-27f0-4815-9e24-1fcf65e8c23e@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <aeb672f0-9a41-4e74-aadc-9763dbbea520@2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Organization Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
From Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org>
Date 2012-04-05 01:25 +0200
Message-ID <m2r4w3gjvp.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> writes:

> You should use the TYPE attribute for all SCRIPT elements.

With what value?

> Never mind
> what HTML5 says as many browsers in use today predate that
> "standard".

I rather wouldn't mind what HTML 4 says, namely

<http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#adef-type-SCRIPT>
(e.g., "text/javascript")
 ^^^^

where the exempli gratia predates RFC 4329 more than half a decade.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

question on scope in callback Jedrin <jrubiando@gmail.com> - 2012-03-31 05:01 -0700
  Re: question on scope in callback David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-31 14:26 -0700
    Re: question on scope in callback Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-05 01:25 +0200
      Re: question on scope in callback Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-04-05 06:11 +0200
      Re: question on scope in callback Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-06 21:46 +0100

csiph-web