Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22359
| From | Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Date Conversion ? |
| Date | 2013-12-17 18:10 -0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <l8qb46$me$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <bh9en6Foh76U1@mid.individual.net> <1l7578dngtzld$.19qzw1e0gy93t$.dlg@40tude.net> <l8o67q$tli$1@dont-email.me> <1744237.gKV8rdnPMv@PointedEars.de> |
On 17/12/2013 12:12, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> // low and high are now the minimum and maximum values from the array
>
> In implementations of ECMAScript Ed. 3, it is easier and probably more
> efficient to use the built-in Math.min() and Math.max() methods:
>
> var low = Math.min.apply(Math, arr);
> var high = Math.max.apply(Math, arr);
Brilliant!
> They also work for Date instances as Array elements because they convert the
> arguments to Number before comparison. In general, if these methods are
> implemented, it is easiest to overwrite the “valueOf” property of the
> prototype object of the objects for the call – or provide the objects
> themselves with one –, which is triggered first by the internal ToNumber
> algorithm when called with hint Number.
>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.8.2.11>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-9.3>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-9.1>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-8.12.8>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.9.5.8>
>
> One can also access the first and last element of a sorted array:
>
> var sortedCopy = arr.slice().sort(function (a, b) { return a - b; });
> var low = sortedCopy[0];
> var high = sortedCopy[sortedCopy.length - 1];
>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.4.4.11>
or
var low = sortedCopy.shift();
var high = sortedCopy.pop();
>
> Finally, all implementations of ECMAScript Ed. 5 – not just JavaScript
> anymore – provide Array.prototype.reduce(), as mentioned by Björn:
>
> var low = arr.reduce(
> function (accumulator, e, i, a) {
> if (е < accumulator)
> {
> return e;
> }
>
> return accumulator;
> },
> arr[0]);
>
> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.4.4.21>
'accumulator' is a bad name, as you are not accumulating anything in
that function.
>
> There appears to be no point to use .map() here because if you have .map()
> you have .reduce() and can thereby shorten the scope chain.
>
ACK.
--
Joao Rodrigues (J.R.)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Date Conversion ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-12-16 15:55 -0700
Re: Date Conversion ? Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de> - 2013-12-17 01:06 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-19 12:34 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-20 22:29 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-12-23 10:00 -0200
Re: Date Conversion ? JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2013-12-17 07:06 +0700
Re: Date Conversion ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-17 00:35 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-12-16 18:16 -0700
Re: Date Conversion ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-12-17 10:09 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-17 17:02 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-12-18 19:14 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-12-19 15:42 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? "Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> - 2013-12-19 09:20 -0600
Re: Date Conversion ? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-12-20 10:04 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-17 15:12 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-12-17 18:10 -0200
Re: Date Conversion ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-17 21:42 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de> - 2013-12-18 13:36 +0100
Re: Date Conversion ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-12-17 19:02 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-12-17 20:51 -0700
Re: Date Conversion ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-12-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-12-20 09:52 -0700
Re: Date Conversion ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-12-21 20:41 +0000
Re: Date Conversion ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-12-22 09:52 -0700
csiph-web