Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #19559
| From | Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it |
| Date | 2013-05-01 22:12 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kls3vj$6b7$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <klrbhd$duk$1@dont-email.me> <guagt.23460$zH4.10295@newsfe13.iad> <XnsA1B3C892E7F06eejj99@194.109.133.133> |
On Wed, 01 May 2013 19:43:01 +0200, Evertjan. wrote: > Daniel Pitts wrote on 01 mei 2013 in comp.lang.javascript: > >> Alternatively, instead of using 1 base, use 0 base and when you need >> "every third element", for (var i = 2; i < bookingArray.length; i+=3) >> >> > for (var i = 0; i < bookingArray.length/3; i++) > x = bookingArray[i * 3 + 1]; I think the last "+ 1" should be +2 0 indexed, the first element he wants (with i = 0) is element [2] (the third element) but x above will be element [1] when i = 0 ( 0 * 3 + 1 ) -- Denis McMahon, denismfmcmahon@gmail.com
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it "Tony" <tony.johansson@inport.com> - 2013-05-01 17:18 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-01 08:26 -0700
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-05-01 19:43 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-01 15:15 -0700
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-05-02 09:35 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 14:31 +0000
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 22:12 +0000
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-05-02 09:36 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 08:52 -0700
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-03 01:26 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 08:53 -0700
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-03 18:39 +0200
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 11:00 -0700
Sorting arrays of objects (was: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-05 01:00 +0200
Re: Sorting arrays of objects (was: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it) Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 08:53 -0700
Re: About keeping my array 1 based after having sorted it Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-05-04 16:14 +0100
csiph-web