Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #17661
| From | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: baffled trying to call style.display value |
| Date | 2012-12-10 22:45 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ka5l59$dtq$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8b828e29-6604-45c7-9166-f17e5b39724d@googlegroups.com> <b4e1ee7a-a68b-40cc-bafc-af3a473b03f6@o30g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <1609195.3fhKV6gEnR@PointedEars.de> <f1d77ed8-ae96-454f-8ebd-409791470768@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <7546793.cFEfZxNJhn@PointedEars.de> |
On 2012-12-10 16:04, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: .. >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> The “style” property of DOM element objects refers to an object that >>> implements the CSSStyleDeclaration interface, whose properties in turn >>> have values that reflect the properties declared in the “style” attribute >>> value of the represented element. Those properties are part of the CSS2Properties interface, not the CSSStyleDeclaration interface. >>> there is no “Javascript”. Repetitive like a prayer mill... Or maybe a different type of mill: http://i.imgur.com/5UhdL.png > And if your postings in > this thread are examples of what the new FAQ is going to be, you should sure > hope that you find many knowledgable people to help correct your many > wannabe misconceptions, unless you want [rant snipped] You've expressed an interest in becoming an FAQ maintainer. Now there's an actual effort to make the current FAQ editable and maintainable, but I haven't seen any response from you about it yet. Are you going to participate in this, or would you rather continue looking for week-old posts to criticize? - stefan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
baffled trying to call style.display value JeffG <jeffgutsell@fuse.net> - 2012-11-27 08:08 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-11-27 08:20 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-10 01:24 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-12-10 05:03 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-10 16:04 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-12-10 08:54 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-10 19:36 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-12-10 22:45 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-11 10:19 +1100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-11 00:34 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-12-10 07:39 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-10 17:10 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-27 17:33 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-11-27 17:49 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value JeffG <jeffgutsell@fuse.net> - 2012-11-27 09:38 -0800
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-11-27 17:59 +0000
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-11-27 21:01 +0100
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-11-27 22:32 +0000
Re: baffled trying to call style.display value Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-11-27 23:50 +0100
csiph-web