Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16280

Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id")

From "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id")
Date 2012-09-30 22:28 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k4a6g0$88u$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <k48a8p$he5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k48ubc$ab6$1@dont-email.me> <k49gk3$3db$2@dont-email.me> <k49kg5$1bo$1@dont-email.me> <m2626vxr8u.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>

Show all headers | View raw


2012-09-30 22:09, Eric Bednarz wrote:

> "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> writes:
>
>> 2012-09-30 16:14, Denis McMahon wrote:
>>
>>> But the existing code is broken: document.all.formname
>>
>> It does not work on modern browsers in "standards mode".
>
> s/modern browsers/Firefox

Well, if it generally works on modern browsers except Firefox in 
"standards mode", the question "why fix it?" is even more emphatic.

>> But if the
>> pages now use such constructs and generally work in browsers, then the
>> pages are apparently processed in "quirks mode". So fixing the
>> construct is irrelevant [...]
>
> That is patently bad advice.

Oh, why?

If pages now work in "quirks mode", then there is seldom any good reason 
to spend time in "fixing" them to work in "standards mode". Part of this 
is the complexity of "quirks mode". There can be a wide range of 
problems lurking around if you switch to "standards" mode. It is much 
more productive to concentrate on keeping the content OK and on creating 
new pages (and in the latter, you would of course use as 
"standard-conforming" techniques as possible).

(If, however, someone is really considering the effort of converting an 
existing site from "quirks" to "standards", then he could consider 
changing document.all.formname to document.formname. But this would be a 
rather trivial part of the job.)

-- 
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-29 18:15 +0000
  Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-29 22:17 +0200
  Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") dann90038@gmail.com - 2012-09-29 16:21 -0700
  Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-29 23:20 -0300
    Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-29 19:53 -0700
    Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 11:02 +0300
      Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 13:10 +0000
      Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 13:14 +0000
        Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 17:20 +0300
          Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-09-30 21:09 +0200
            Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 22:28 +0300
              Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-09-30 21:53 +0200
            Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 21:53 +0200
          Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 22:07 +0000
            Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-10-01 06:23 +0300
              Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 08:11 +0000
                Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 11:25 +0200
      Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-30 15:10 -0300
        Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 20:43 +0200
    Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 12:22 +0200
      Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 13:44 +0300
        Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 13:46 +0200
  Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-30 20:10 +0100

csiph-web