Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16280
| From | "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") |
| Date | 2012-09-30 22:28 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k4a6g0$88u$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <k48a8p$he5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k48ubc$ab6$1@dont-email.me> <k49gk3$3db$2@dont-email.me> <k49kg5$1bo$1@dont-email.me> <m2626vxr8u.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> |
2012-09-30 22:09, Eric Bednarz wrote: > "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> writes: > >> 2012-09-30 16:14, Denis McMahon wrote: >> >>> But the existing code is broken: document.all.formname >> >> It does not work on modern browsers in "standards mode". > > s/modern browsers/Firefox Well, if it generally works on modern browsers except Firefox in "standards mode", the question "why fix it?" is even more emphatic. >> But if the >> pages now use such constructs and generally work in browsers, then the >> pages are apparently processed in "quirks mode". So fixing the >> construct is irrelevant [...] > > That is patently bad advice. Oh, why? If pages now work in "quirks mode", then there is seldom any good reason to spend time in "fixing" them to work in "standards mode". Part of this is the complexity of "quirks mode". There can be a wide range of problems lurking around if you switch to "standards" mode. It is much more productive to concentrate on keeping the content OK and on creating new pages (and in the latter, you would of course use as "standard-conforming" techniques as possible). (If, however, someone is really considering the effort of converting an existing site from "quirks" to "standards", then he could consider changing document.all.formname to document.formname. But this would be a rather trivial part of the job.) -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-29 18:15 +0000
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-29 22:17 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") dann90038@gmail.com - 2012-09-29 16:21 -0700
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-29 23:20 -0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-29 19:53 -0700
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 11:02 +0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 13:10 +0000
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 13:14 +0000
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 17:20 +0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-09-30 21:09 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 22:28 +0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-09-30 21:53 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 21:53 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 22:07 +0000
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-10-01 06:23 +0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 08:11 +0000
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 11:25 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-09-30 15:10 -0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 20:43 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 12:22 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-09-30 13:44 +0300
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 13:46 +0200
Re: document.elementname vs document.getElementById("id") Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-30 20:10 +0100
csiph-web