Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10427
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table |
| Date | Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:45:06 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <jfc96t$lb1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <8nsih7pjdunj21096qub8tnr1mluk2bons@4ax.com> <jfbvpn$u7v$1@dont-email.me> <4f1989d2$0$6921$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:45:02 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ngroV0xYIIv0dzjhyZhv5A"; logging-data="21857"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CXPGcTsATuAnEZFh9W13X" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <4f1989d2$0$6921$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Antivirus | avast! (VPS 120120-0, 20.01.2012), Outbound message |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:tPrrqmgG90EI9W5oSftgM+pRpbo= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:10427 |
Show key headers only | View raw
2012-01-20 17:35, Erwin Moller wrote: > On 1/20/2012 4:04 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: [...] >> I suppose you have considered the obvious solution of not writing >> WIDTH=100% for a specific table, and I suppose the reason for rejecting >> that idea is in the logic of your server-side code: you're in the midst >> of writing data when you find out that something should have been done >> earlier. [...] > Why not simply give the table an id and use that? Because you cannot do that when you have already generated the <table> tag and a few rows. Or, you could do that by operating in the document tree, but this would be just a more complicated version of doing what I suggested. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 14:04 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Captain Paralytic <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-20 06:20 -0800
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-01-20 17:04 +0200
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 16:35 +0100
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-01-20 19:45 +0200
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 18:49 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-22 13:57 -0800
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-20 22:17 +0100
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 06:28 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-01-21 11:07 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-21 19:52 +0100
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 06:54 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-22 14:06 +0100
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-01-22 15:17 +0200
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 06:52 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 07:10 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-23 16:36 +0100
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Dr J R Stockton <reply1203@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-21 20:50 +0000
Re: Shrinking the width of a WIDTH=100% table Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 06:42 +0000
csiph-web