Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29787

Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Date 2016-03-03 04:48 -0800
References <ddbd7b1c-84f0-4ab5-8400-60ece696f317@googlegroups.com> <2c2b764a-6f78-486a-9ace-9ee65b6e17b4@googlegroups.com> <ce2b42d3-9600-47f6-b804-7f81d6bdd6b0@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <bc3af71e-c899-4a9f-8496-35fb41374be2@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by
From Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 8:32:45 PM UTC-5, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 9:03:12 PM UTC-6, Scott Sauyet wrote:
> 
> > Disappointing to me was that this has nothing to do with Cycle.js, [4] the 
> > first web framework in years to actually look interesting to me.
> 
> You might be interested in this (apparently) abandoned data format:
> 
> <http://wayback.archive.org/web/20150827182315/http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~ptw/teaching/ssd/slide11.html>
> 
> Combine with another abandoned concept from JavaScript 1.8.4:
> 
> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Web/Sharp_variables_in_JavaScript>
> 
> I made a token attempt to get this into the language proper, but it didn't go anywhere sadly:
> 
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-May/014744.html>
> 
> I'll ping him again to see if there is any possibility of reviving this.

Thanks for the historical links!

Quite interesting, particularly http://wayback.archive.org/web/20150827182315/http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~ptw/teaching/ssd/slide11.html. This seems like it would be relatively straightforward to support using $1, $2, $3, etc. in place of the &1, &2, &3, etc. references. However, it would loose the class restoration semantics incorporated into cycler.js.

We have mucked around a good bit with serialization and restoration semantics and cycle.js gave us the inspiration for the approach used in cycler.js. This is the most elegant and least intrusive method we have found to date. Is anyone aware of another method not tied to a specific database or schema definition mechanism?

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-03-01 09:23 -0800
  Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 19:03 -0800
    Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-03-02 05:42 -0800
    Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-02 17:32 -0800
      Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-02 17:37 -0800
      Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 19:26 -0800
      Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-03-03 04:48 -0800
        Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-03 06:45 -0800
          Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-03-04 10:19 -0800
            Re: Cycler ... cycle.js revisited Re-factoring and enhancing an old stand-by Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:17 -0800

csiph-web