Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #98248

Nuclear Bomb Video Clip Download !LINK!

Show all headers | View raw

<div>The Pare Lorentz Center at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum added narration to archival film, photographs and audio recordings to tell the story of FDR during World War II. This segment explains the events that led to the development of the atomic bomb.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>nuclear bomb video clip download</div><div></div><div>Download: https://t.co/KwlWvAl5rN </div><div></div><div></div><div>To provide with a fuller understanding of the Manhattan Project and the War in the Pacific, have the students view each of the following introductory video clips and answer the questions associated with each. Students can use the handout linked below to access the videos and answer the questions.</div><div></div><div></div><div>After answering the previous questions, students should use the chart on the handout to take notes to help them answer the following question: Was using the atomic bomb on Japan necessary for ending World War II?</div><div></div><div></div><div>Yes. If the solar energy that strikes Earth each second were converted to mass,it would equal nearly four pounds. The sun's energy is generated by nuclearfusion: at the heart of the sun, under tremendous pressure, hydrogen atoms fusetogether to form helium. Each new atom of helium, though, has less mass thanthe four original hydrogen atoms that created it. The "lost" mass radiates offas light that can warm the Earth 93 million miles away.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Correct. Of course, on Earth there is no practical way to convert pennies, paper clips, or other objects entirely to energy. It would require temperatures and pressures greater than those at the core of our sun. In theory, though, a dollar's worth of change could satisfy all of New York State's energy needs for about two days. Humankind uses so much energy in a month that it would take about 1,000 pounds worth of change.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Documentary is happy to debut an exclusive clip from Irene Lusztig's Richland ahead of its premiere in the Documentary Competition at Tribeca 2023 this weekend. This scene is filmed during the 75th anniversary of the Hanford Site, which the New York Times affirmed "is the largest and most contaminated" of all former nuclear weapons production sites in a feature article from last week. As part of the weekslong celebration, the nearby city of Richland, Washington, restaged Atomic Frontier Day, an annual nuclear pride parade event held from the 1940s through 1960 that included a parade, military plane flyover, uplifting speeches about the nuclear bomb, kids' crafting stations, and more.</div><div></div><div></div><div>But nuclear weapons, including those being tested in the archival footage, are very real. Since the U.S. tested the first atomic bomb in Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, thousands of nuclear tests have been carried out all over the world, spurred in part by the nuclear arms race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.</div><div></div><div></div><div>This includes the above-ground testing in the footage that occurred before it was banned by the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty. More than 30 years later, the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty banned all nuclear explosions on Earth.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Cameras used to film these above-ground tests were protected by specially designed set-ups meant to withstand the enormous impact of nuclear weapons, as detailed in declassified military reports written at the time of the testing.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Attempts to capture nuclear weapons testing on film were not always successful, despite these efforts. The 1955 report, for instance, notes that major dust obstruction was an issue, especially for interior shots. A report from 1953, on Operation Upshot-Knothole, also conducted in Nevada, describes film that was ruined due to nuclear radiation and cameras that were destroyed from a blast wave.</div><div></div><div></div><div>This article is in response to the Carnegie Council video clip "Are Nuclear Weapons Useful?" and was first posted on the Fordham University Center for Ethics Education website on February 2, 2016.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>On July 16, 1945 at 5:29 am, a 30,000 foot mass of smoke rose in New Mexico's desert: the first atomic bomb had just been successfully tested. At the time, most people were unaware that the course of warfare and ultimately the world was about to change irrevocably. Since that eerie summer morning, nine nations have developed the intelligence to create and possess nuclear weapons (Granoff, 2000, p. 1414). The United States is one of these nuclear superpowers, making the ethical issues associated with these weapons critical and relevant.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Is using a nuclear weapon morally permissible under some circumstances? Is it ethical to implement nuclear deterrence (threatening to use atomic weapons) as a self-defense strategy?</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Most research across disciplines unanimously agrees that it is immoral to detonate an atomic weapon due to both short and long-term catastrophic effects. Therefore, this piece shall not focus on the actual use of nuclear weapons, but instead analyze the latter question. Using various philosophical concepts, it will explore the fundamental question as to whether any implementation of nuclear deterrence that involves a risk to civilians is morally acceptable. The models, though differing in origin and rationale, provide a unique lens from which to view this ethical dilemma.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>"Since the advent of nuclear weapons, it seems clear that there is no longer any alternative to peace, if there is to be a happy and well world."</div><div></div><div>Remarks at the Department of State 1954 Honor Awards Ceremony, 10/19/54 [AUDIO]</div><div></div><div></div><div>"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road. the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron."</div><div></div><div>Address "The Chance for Peace" Delivered Before the American Society of Newspaper Editors, 4/16/53 [AUDIO]</div><div></div><div></div><div>Seventy years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Red Cross hospitals are still treating thousands of survivors and identifying new links between radiation exposure and fatal illnesses.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The commemoration of the dropping of the bombs comes just months after the Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons failed to agree a move forward towards their elimination.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Mardan's latest comments come as Russian President Vladimir Putin announced plans to station tactical nuclear weapons in neighbouring Belarus, which Russia used as a staging ground before launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Danilov said it maximizes what he called the level of "negative perception and public rejection" of Russia and Putin in Belarusian society. "The [Kremlin] took Belarus as a nuclear hostage," he added.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The Atomic Cafe is a 1982 American documentary film directed by Kevin Rafferty, Jayne Loader and Pierce Rafferty.[2][3][4] It is a compilation of clips from newsreels, military training films, and other footage produced in the United States early in the Cold War on the subject of nuclear warfare. Without any narration, the footage is edited and presented in a manner to demonstrate how misinformation and propaganda was used by the U.S. government and popular culture to ease fears about nuclear weapons among the American public.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The film covers the beginnings of the era of nuclear warfare, created from a broad range of archival material from the 1940s, 1950s and early 1960s including newsreel clips, television news footage, U.S. government-produced films (including military training films), advertisements, television and radio programs.[6] News footage reflected the prevailing understanding of the media and public.[7] The film covers both the impact of the atomic bomb on popular culture and daily life, as well as documents the military's increasing fascination with carrying out more and more dangerous tests. The film opens with footage of the Trinity Test and concludes with a montage of stock footage simulating a nuclear attack on the United States.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Though the topic of atomic holocaust is a grave matter, much of the humor[8] derives from the modern audience's reaction to old training films, such as the Duck and Cover film shown in schools. Another sequence involves footage of US Army training maneuvers in which soldiers are instructed to walk into a mushroom cloud as part of an exercise to study how efficiently the armed forces could kill the survivors of a nuclear bomb strike if Soviet Soldiers ever made it to US soil; prior to the beginning of the exercise, the soldiers are informed, "Viewed from a safe distance, the atomic bomb is one of the most beautiful sights ever seen by man."</div><div></div><div></div><div>The Atomic Cafe, referred to as a "compilation verite" with no "voice of God narration" or any recently shot footage, was released at the height of nostalgia and cynicism in America. By 1982, Americans lost much of their faith in their government following the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal the previous decade,[9] alongside the seemingly never-ending arms race with the Soviet Union.[10] The Atomic Cafe reflects and reinforces this idea as it exposes how the atomic bomb's dangers were downplayed and how the government used films to shape public opinion.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Bob Mielke, in "Rhetoric and Ideology in the Nuclear Test Documentary" (Film Quarterly) discusses the release of The Atomic Cafe: "This satire feature was released at the height of the nuclear freeze movement (which was in turn responding to the Reagan administration's surreal handling of the arms race.)"[13]</div><div></div><div> df19127ead</div>

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nuclear Bomb Video Clip Download !LINK! Yufei Labbe <labbeyufei@gmail.com> - 2024-01-20 09:00 -0800

csiph-web