Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20146

Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ?

Show key headers only | View raw

Stefan said:

\> Something I've never understood about mod_deflate: why is there no way
> to cache deflated static files? If you have a large script that you want
> mod_deflate to compress before sending, it will do so for every single
> fresh request. Granted, gzipping a script file is not likely to make a
> major impact on a server, but it's still a waste of resources.
>
> Other HTTP servers do have a cache like that (for example, mod_compress
> in Lighttpd).
>
> It's not a deal breaker; I still use mod_deflate. I just dislike the
> needless waste of cycles when it would be so simple to add a cache
> (memory or disk based).


Hi Stefan:

    Because I have approx 67 different 'Big' files available to send out to 
clients, and they are based on data that is usually not changing 'much' over 
the course of a year, I have decided to save a copy of the pre-built  big 
files *when* they are first requested.

    Then, the next time I have a request for one of the 67 (or so) big 
files, I've already got it built, and I simply read it in and then pass it 
to Apache for transmission to the client.

    Also, if I have occasion over the course of the year to update the 'big' 
file, then I manually delete the saved file, and my cgi app notices the 
missing file, rebuilds a new one, saves it, then sends the newly updated 
file to the client.

    I save about 1/4 of a second doing this :)))

-Mel

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 13:59 -0600
  Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-06-03 13:39 -0700
    Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 14:46 -0600
    Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 02:07 +0200
      Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 18:40 -0600
        Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 20:38 -0600
        Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-04 09:11 -0600
          Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-04 12:47 -0600
            Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 22:44 +0200
              Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-04 16:02 -0600
            Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-04 20:24 -0600
              Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2013-06-05 14:50 +0200
                Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-05 22:38 -0600
              Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2013-06-05 08:51 -0400
                OT: Accept-Encoding (was: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ?) Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-06-05 15:23 +0200
  Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2013-06-05 18:12 -0700
    Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-06 08:54 -0600

csiph-web