Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20131
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? |
| Date | Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:46:04 -0600 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <b14dkjFks79U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b14atkFk8dnU1@mid.individual.net> <7dc473f5-c0e8-415b-92e1-f6201220fe9d@j8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> |
| X-Trace | individual.net Z3K6ArPYWvmk1K2VzF4MVgOSk/cG/AR08vfyr09kf7mGvyMnKT |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:V9DG7+VmpUyuRCJJxCx5jAm3H7Y= |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 |
| X-RFC2646 | Format=Flowed; Original |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:20131 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Scott said:
One micro-benchmark can be found here:
<http://jsperf.com/array-index-push/3>
In all the more recent browsers except IE9, `push` is faster.
Unfortunately, in IE8 and IE9, it's quite a bit slower. And since
that's already the slowest environment, you'll have to make a decision
with that in mind.
But regardless of speed, `push` is certainly cleaner. And in my mind,
that counts for a fair bit.
Thanks Scott --- I'll probably revert to .push
-Mel
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 13:59 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-06-03 13:39 -0700
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 14:46 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 02:07 +0200
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 18:40 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-03 20:38 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-04 09:11 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-04 12:47 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 22:44 +0200
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-04 16:02 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-04 20:24 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2013-06-05 14:50 +0200
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-06-05 22:38 -0600
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2013-06-05 08:51 -0400
OT: Accept-Encoding (was: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ?) Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-06-05 15:23 +0200
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2013-06-05 18:12 -0700
Re: 'pushing' vs direct array assignment ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-06 08:54 -0600
csiph-web