Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34017
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Databases, was: Re: Max size file |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <4320db69-c5e5-441c-89c2-b6f3d06a16ee@googlegroups.com> <XnsA7F8C5B42B61eejj99@194.109.6.166> <ec53b51c-a7f8-4651-8fb8-94aebe4043e0@googlegroups.com> <XnsA7F9B769F5766eejj99@194.109.6.166> <e4ce3145-7f6e-40d8-9583-695e05918f1b@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2017-09-23 22:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA7F9E597DA66Feejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote on 23 Sep 2017 in comp.lang.javascript: > I wrote: >> A database without integrity is NOT a database, >> because to call a file a database >> it MUST have some applyable integrity-rules, Nass Jo. >> >> You could even say that all files, >> having usable content, >> are databases, >> so a corrupted database is not a database, Jo. > > Strange i always thought of a database as a set of relational > records/datasets, the first databases was not multiuser and had no > integrity rules? I did not talk about multi-user, even while a database does not mind in itself what user uses it. If you mean concurrent use, that even now largely depends on the knowledge of the programmer. > Nowadays they have. Well No, a working database cannot exist without integrety rules. Even a file with just a single number in it is a database, btw. > A database is an organized collection of data.[1] Why the [1]? What would a disorganised collection of data look like? Something without integrety rules, perhaps? > It is a collection of > schemas, tables, queries, reports, views, and other objects. Not neccessarily, it is a collecion of one ore more pieces of data. Even a file with just a single number in it is(/can be seen as) a database. > I think you are wrong, it is the organisation of data into a tree by > "threading" that constitute the database. Well, I am reasonably sure to be right. > The integrity and multiuser > functionality come long after the first database. After the third, perhaps? Nonsense. > The database was about > not needing empty properties in records, that was the original purpose > "well and not have to read out data sequentially. > > Am I wrong? Yes. You are confused by thinking a special type of database, [perhaps the ones under MS-ACCESS or SQL-server] that are called "relational databases", are the only ones, however for instance huge distributed databases of Google are necessarily not of that kind. A database is JUST a collecion of one ore more pieces of data. ========== Sometimes, when I need a limited set of changing data, perhaps only one record with a number of fields, it pays of to use a serverside file using "Scripting.FileSystemObject" under ASP, bypassing the overhead of a dedicated database-engine, and for instance being able to save dayly database-copies without much memory-impact. Yes then I miss the concurrent multiuser safety, but also the always looming database deadlock. -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-22 06:17 -0700
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-22 19:26 +0200
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-23 08:37 -0700
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-23 08:44 -0700
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-23 18:01 +0200
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-23 09:09 -0700
Databases, was: Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-23 22:34 +0200
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-23 22:35 +0200
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-23 09:26 -0700
Databases, was: Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-23 22:45 +0200
Re: Max size file John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-09-24 10:58 +0100
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-24 12:12 +0200
Re: Max size file John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-09-24 12:06 +0100
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-24 17:21 +0200
Re: Max size file jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-09-24 10:07 -0700
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-24 22:05 +0200
Re: Max size file John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@sympatico.ca> - 2017-09-23 15:20 -0400
Re: Max size file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-09-23 22:48 +0200
csiph-web