Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33600
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: timeline |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <D_6dndl-zu23-u3EnZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <b881ncd79ss9ftao97dpjtc4vulcm1fpe6@4ax.com> <r_2dnXFol6JBuezEnZ2dnUU7-YfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <8or2nc1ssbt7q8c9eqpn18msa6m34i1h1f@4ax.com> <H4ednb_LIuvIB-zEnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| Date | 2017-07-21 11:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA7B9760D9356eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> wrote on 21 Jul 2017 in comp.lang.javascript: > Quite the contrary. We have adopted a user-centric approach to all our > work and almost everything goes through rigorous user testing and > acceptance. We do care a lot about our user's needs, wants, and desires. What is the difference between wants and desires, btw? Does the user have the knowledge to know what (s)he needs? You should have the professional quality and courage to weigh those needs and desires against the robust quality and servicability of the product. User and programmer should learn eachother's language and possibilities and requirements. This process should be lead by the professionality of the programmer, as for her or him this process should be innate. And using simple, understandable, cross-browser reliable code not only is good for the user's budget, but also makes your work better and easier. So methinks the clientside code approach for things that could be better or just as good done on the server is a bad thing, and emulating different pages by clientside code should be avoided, even when giving it fancy names like a 'timeline'. -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
timeline Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 18:17 +1000
Re: timeline "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-07-20 10:26 +0200
Re: timeline Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-07-20 08:37 -0400
Re: timeline Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-21 07:47 +1000
Re: timeline Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-07-20 23:04 -0400
Re: timeline Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-21 16:08 +1000
Re: timeline "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-07-21 11:36 +0200
Re: timeline Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-07-21 08:50 -0700
Re: timeline "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-07-22 00:03 +0200
Re: timeline Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-22 15:00 +1000
Re: timeline "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-07-22 10:19 +0200
Re: timeline Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: timeline "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-07-23 10:15 +0200
Re: timeline "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2017-07-20 05:56 -0700
Re: timeline Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-23 19:07 +0200
Re: timeline Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-07-20 05:59 -0700
Re: timeline Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-23 18:57 +0200
Re: timeline Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-07-23 10:33 -0700
csiph-web