Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33233

Re: -2 ** 2

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: -2 ** 2
From "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References (3 earlier) <slrnognfde.50n.jon+usenet@sable.unequivocal.eu> <XnsA76C5E4D9FE3Beejj99@194.109.6.166> <rhfogcl0fb2qg5l9oiga5p44nrrfdj32s6@4ax.com> <XnsA76C72A62E467eejj99@194.109.6.166> <eg5rgc1facueimiaiuplgh5050841pi0ca@4ax.com>
Date 2017-05-06 11:42 +0200
Message-ID <XnsA76D7719921D9eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> wrote on 06 May 2017 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> On Fri, 05 May 2017 11:16:13 +0200, "Evertjan."
> <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> wrote:
> 
>   <snip>
>>I said what I find unforgivable parsing above,
>>as it is clearly an unary minus,
>>I repeat it here:
>>
>>let  r2 = 0 + -2 ^ 2; // -2;
> 
> Equally clearly a negative number is being raised to the power 2, so
> the result is +4, not -4.

Sorry, meant -4 and 4.

>>I'm not in the least interested in justifying choices on demand.
>   <snip>
> 
> But you are willing to say your choice is the only right one.

NOT AT ALL.

[I don't under stand the "willing to" part, I either say something or I 
don't in a NG. Or did you forget a question-mark?]

I do not claim that I am right, I try to learn from discussion,
and, starting off with my argumented ideas, I am open to argumented 
arguments to the contrary.

"the only right one"?

I do not think there is a single right way of defining operator precedence 
in JS-parsing, but we still can argue about [personal or group] preference.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: -2 ** 2 Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2017-05-04 14:13 +0000
  Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-05-04 16:56 +0100
    Re: -2 ** 2 Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-05-04 12:08 -0500
    Re: -2 ** 2 John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-04 20:02 +0100
    Re: -2 ** 2 Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2017-05-04 23:44 +0000
      Re: -2 ** 2 "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-05 09:16 +0200
        Re: -2 ** 2 John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-05 09:56 +0100
          Re: -2 ** 2 "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-05 11:16 +0200
            Re: -2 ** 2 John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-06 10:27 +0100
              Re: -2 ** 2 "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-06 11:42 +0200
  Re: -2 ** 2 Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2017-05-04 11:01 -0500
  Re: -2 ** 2 Sam E <why.should.this@be.email.invalid> - 2017-05-04 12:04 -0500
    Re: -2 ** 2 John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-04 19:29 +0100
      Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-05-04 19:51 +0100
        Re: -2 ** 2 John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-05 09:41 +0100
        Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2017-05-05 11:02 -0400
          Re: -2 ** 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-05 17:47 +0200
          Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-05-05 16:49 +0100
            Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2017-05-06 11:21 -0400
              Re: -2 ** 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-06 19:04 +0200
                Re: -2 ** 2 Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2017-05-07 12:40 -0400
                Re: -2 ** 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 20:35 +0200
                Re: -2 ** 2 RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-05-10 17:46 -0700
                Re: -2 ** 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-11 03:00 +0200
          Re: -2 ** 2 Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-05-05 23:20 -0500
          Re: -2 ** 2 Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-08 23:19 +0100
      Re: -2 ** 2 Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-08 23:16 +0100
        Re: -2 ** 2 "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2017-05-09 09:55 -0700
        Re: -2 ** 2 Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-10 17:39 +0100
          Re: -2 ** 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-11 03:08 +0200

csiph-web