Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM

Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM
From	"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References	(6 earlier) <0d5ac50b-0714-4c52-bd9e-593f5b6f4b5d@googlegroups.com> <XnsA694F0BCAD5D7eejj99@194.109.6.166> <d8adef5f-71d6-4571-87c5-84db764dd2cd@googlegroups.com> <XnsA6955F842E64Deejj99@194.109.6.166> <3e1e91eb-4710-4f63-b2d7-c1f96327b78d@googlegroups.com>
Date	2016-10-03 09:43 +0200
Message-ID	<XnsA69662DAF30E0eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> wrote on 02 Oct 2016 in
comp.lang.javascript: 

> On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 3:23:25 AM UTC-4, Evertjan. wrote:
>> justaguy <kkwewewewe@gmail.com> wrote on 02 Oct 2016 in
>> comp.lang.javascript: 
>> 
>> > I like your points of view.
>> 
>> Whose view?
>> 
>> "Dom" in Dutch means "dumb, stupid", not only virtually so.
>> 
>> > Next question, i posted a question on re-writing bettet JavaScript
>> > code 
> ,
>> > could you comment on that? Thanks.
> 
> Respectfully disagree.

Disagree with what?

> For one thing, DOM (Document Object Model)
> provides a convenient way to allow dynamic creation/addition/insertion
> of new HTML elements should additional data entry requires it.  Without
> DOM, such additional data entry via HTML element(s) does not seem easily
> doable. 
>  
> 



-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:54 -0700
  Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-09-30 20:58 +0200
    Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 04:23 -0700
      Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-10-01 13:57 +0200
        Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:25 -0700
          Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-10-01 21:43 +0200
            Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:29 -0700
              Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
                Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 17:35 -0700
                Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-10-02 09:23 +0200
                Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 14:28 -0700
                Re: virtual DOM vs. regular DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-10-03 09:43 +0200

csiph-web