Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30385
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Adding data to a function |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <Adding-data-20160502223342@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Date | 2016-05-03 00:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5FDFB322EBeejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote on 02 May 2016 in
comp.lang.javascript:
> The following function always would recompute
> Żwindow.document.getElementById( "info" )Ž.
>
> "use strict";
>
> function f()
> { window.document.getElementById( "info" ).innerHTML
> = 'The function "f" was called.'; }
>
> Is it good style to attach this data to f as a property of f,
> so that it does not have to be recomputed each time f is
> being called, i.e.: [....]
Methinks "Is it good style to ... ?"
is not a good question,
as it calls for subjective preferences
like "is this a beautiful painting?"
You could ask:
"Is it clearer scripting sourcecode for newbees?"
or
"Does this involve less cpu-time?"
Methinks, the clearer code Q is important, sometimes.
The cpu-time consumption is not, as:
- how many times would you want an innerHTML to change per second?
- the difference in fetching a DOM-pointer from a DOM id-array or as an
object-property [or even as a simple variable] will not matter much imho,
but you could try to measure that for different browsers, if you like.
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Adding data to a function "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-05-03 00:05 +0200
csiph-web