Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28633
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: questions re Javascript |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <2b531f48-fff9-4c73-a116-22a3f110e919@googlegroups.com> <020920150828500988%timstreater@greenbee.net> <java-and-javascript-20150902121750@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mscc3f$apc$1@dont-email.me> <to-do-20150904163124@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Date | 2015-09-04 18:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA50BBA0F890CBeejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote on 04 Sep 2015 in comp.lang.javascript: > What I objected to was the typical wording > > ŻJavaScript /has nothing to do/ with Java.Ž. It has NOTHING TO DO with it. That MEANS: that the word "Java" in "Javascript" does not mean it is the scripting [=interpreting] form of the compiler-language "Java", and cannot be compared with Vbscript as the scripting form of Visual Basic, ot other script forms of compiler lenguages, or perhaps other compiler forms of scripting languages. It does NOT mean that: both are not computer-languages, both are not a subset of English words, both have never influenced each other, both are nowhere influenced by any common earlier language, are both used by human beings, some of them being smarter than others. -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
questions re Javascript rdelaney2001@gmail.com - 2015-09-01 15:34 -0700
Re: questions re Javascript mentificium@gmail.com - 2015-09-01 15:58 -0700
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-02 08:28 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-09-03 00:43 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-09-03 01:45 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-03 19:57 -0400
Re: questions re Javascript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-09-04 02:37 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-03 20:01 -0400
Re: questions re Javascript Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-09-04 08:46 +0000
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:35 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:09 -0500
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 16:37 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 22:51 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Eternal Hope <laughingspam99@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 20:29 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-04 19:40 -0400
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:47 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 22:16 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2015-09-05 14:14 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Jay Braun <lyngwyst@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:42 -0700
Re: questions re Javascript Chuck Anderson <seemysig@thisis.invalid> - 2015-09-05 03:22 -0600
csiph-web