Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #25266

Re: Element visible

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Element visible
From "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References <eoidnRvwreMiFSHOnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <visibility-20140709041836@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <j9idnT3Ozq34JSHOnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
Date 2014-07-09 09:54 +0200
Message-ID <XnsA36564D26572Ceejj99@194.109.133.133> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> wrote on 09 jul 2014 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> On 9/07/2014 12:18 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>> Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> writes:
>>> Is the only way to know if an element could (ignoring if its been
>>> scrolled off screen or under another element) be visible is to test that
>>> its display is not 'none', its opacity is greater than 0, its visibility
>>> is 'visible', and that its width and height are greater than zero?
>>
>> cssexample { position: absolute; width: 14em; left: -999em; }
> 
> And also ignoring other instances where its positioned off screen.

The content is empty, and no inner background.
The content is empty, 
  and the inner background is the same as the background.
The img is the same as te background.
The img is transparent.
The monitor is switched off.
The window is not visible on screen.

But all of these are OFF topic, wrong NG, mate.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-09 10:09 +1000
  Re: Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-09 13:32 +1000
    Re: Element visible "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-07-09 09:54 +0200
    Re: Element visible Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-07-09 11:18 +0200
      Re: Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-09 23:17 +1000
        Re: Element visible John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-07-09 16:08 +0100
      Re: Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-10 10:07 +1000
        Re: Element visible "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-07-10 09:15 +0200
          Re: Element visible "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2014-07-10 10:45 +0300
            Re: Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-10 22:13 +1000
              Re: Element visible "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-07-10 14:31 +0200
                Re: Element visible Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-07-10 13:35 -0700
                Re: Element visible "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-07-11 00:23 +0200
                Re: Element visible Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-07-12 20:09 -0700
                Re: Element visible "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-07-13 09:07 +0200
          Re: Element visible John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-07-10 10:46 +0100
        Re: Element visible Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-07-10 12:10 +0200
          Re: Element visible Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-07-14 13:00 +1000
          Re: Element visible Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-07-15 15:08 +0200

csiph-web