Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #23050
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Cons in the following object implementation |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <76619944-f726-4102-a16c-0eceddb251a0@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2014-02-10 13:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA2D089FF5B476eejj99@194.109.133.133> (permalink) |
Alon Melanker <melankeril@gmail.com> wrote on 10 feb 2014 in
comp.lang.javascript:
> On a job interview, I've been asked to defined an object with a private
> variable and getter/setter for this private variable.
>
> I chose the following:
>
> var obj = function() {
> var private;
>
> this.setPrivate(val) {
> private = val;
> }
>
> this.getPrivate() {
> return private;
> }
>};
Didn't you ask this before?
> When I've finished to implement the object the interviewer told me there
> are some problems\cons with this object and those "problems" are not the
> setter/getter functions.
>
> I've been asked to point out those flaws, but I couldn't.
>
> Does anyone can point out the flaws in the object?
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11258201/what-does-this-mean-in-
javascript-var-obj-function>
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Cons in the following object implementation Alon Melanker <melankeril@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 04:21 -0800
Re: Cons in the following object implementation "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-02-10 13:33 +0100
Re: Cons in the following object implementation Alon Melanker <melankeril@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 05:22 -0800
Re: Cons in the following object implementation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-02-10 14:53 +0100
csiph-web