Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14474
| From | JJ <jaejunks_at@_googlemail_dot._com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Ineffective Firefox cookie |
| Date | 2012-06-12 23:24 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <XnsA071415512FE0jaejunksgooglemailco@0.0.0.29> (permalink) |
| References | <b5M+F7U$I61PFwO$@freenetname.co.uk> |
Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:b5M+F7U$I61PFwO
$@freenetname.co.uk:
> I installed Firebug from <http://getfirebug.com/>, put a breakpoint In
> "/tfl-global/scripts/tfl-cookies-prompt.js" at setCookie("hide-cookies-
> panel", "yes", 365); in function hidePanel() and stepped through to
> document.cookie = c_name + "=" + c_value + expires + "; path=/";
>
> How do I tell why that line is ineffective?
It's effective. After a TRACE or STEP, the highlight would go to the next
statement. But since there is no more after that, the next one is searched
after the call to that function, which is the caller.
Just inspect the document.cookie or window.document.cookie to see the
result.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ineffective Firefox cookie Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-06-12 21:10 +0100 Re: Ineffective Firefox cookie Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-06-12 14:45 -0700 Re: Ineffective Firefox cookie JJ <jaejunks_at@_googlemail_dot._com> - 2012-06-12 23:24 +0000 Re: Ineffective Firefox cookie Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-13 15:06 +0200
csiph-web