Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #19816

Re: Find an object in a window

Date 2013-05-19 10:06 +1000
From Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Find an object in a window
References <G4WdnS1OUt3I-AnMnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <2083966.lBPHQm9WGc@PointedEars.de> <p62dneXrfKXaUAnMnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <31855897.f2HLQ4rEVA@PointedEars.de>
Message-ID <D6qdnWHdd7UsigXMnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 19/05/2013 12:25 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Andrew Poulos wrote:
>
>> On 16/05/2013 7:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Andrew Poulos wrote:
>>>> I tried writing a recursive function (that sits in the elearning page)
>>>> that searched all frames in the elearning's top window and in the top
>>>> window of any opener which appears to work:
>>>>
>>>> function findAPI(win) {
>>>>      if (win.API) {
>>>>        return win.API;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>>      for (var i = 0; i < win.frames.length; i++) {
>>>          var api = findAPI(win.frames[i]);
>>>          if (api) {
>>>            return api;
>>>>        }
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>>      if (win.opener && !win.opener.closed) {
>>>>        return findAPI(win.opener.top);
>>>>      }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> function fLook() {
>>>>      var foundApi = findAPI(window.top);
>>>>      window.alert(foundApi);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas on how to make this (more) robust? For example, its not
>>>> checking nested frames.
>>>
>>> Now it does.
>>
>> Too easy! Thanks for the help.
>
> You're welcome.  An omission and a further suggestion on my part, though.
>
> The omission:
>
>    for (var i = 0, len = win.frames.length; i < len; i++)
>
> is more efficient than
>
>    for (var i = 0; i < win.frames.length; i++)
>
> and as safe if you can be sure that the number of items does not change
> while looping.  For that matter, if you stored the value of “win.frames” in
> a variable and access that variable instead, it would be even more
> efficient:
>
>    for (var i = 0, frames = win.frames, len = frames.length;
>         i < len; i++)
>    {
>      var api = findAPI(frames[i]);
>      if (api) {
>        return api;
>      }
>    }
>
> Or you might want to wrap it as suggested e. g. in
> <http://naildrivin5.com/blog/2013/05/17/source-code-typography.html?utm_content=buffer5f552&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer>
> (from David Bryant Copeland [@davetron5000 at Github], by tweet of
> @kevinSuttle):
>
>    for (var i = 0,
>             frames = win.frames,
>             len = frames.length;
>         i < len; i++)
>    {
>      var api = findAPI(frames[i]);
>      if (api) {
>        return api;
>      }
>    }
>
>
> The suggestion: _it's_ _e-learning_ :)

If the number of frames is, say, 10 or less would it make a noticeable 
difference from the first way or are you promoting a generally better 
approach?

Andrew Poulos

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Find an object in a window Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-16 14:49 +1000
  Re: Find an object in a window Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-16 11:12 +0200
    Re: Find an object in a window Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-16 22:12 +1000
      Re: Find an object in a window Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-18 16:25 +0200
        Re: Find an object in a window Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-19 10:06 +1000

csiph-web