Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #36899
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-06-13 04:14 -0700 |
| References | (6 earlier) <XnsAA6D7E4028C9Beejj99@194.109.6.166> <0d0ea75c-5b26-4f88-8094-5edeaca4199d@googlegroups.com> <7e2e0f80-cb71-4485-a2ac-c07754af34a5@googlegroups.com> <7c59fdb7-201f-4e71-be56-e8d016c84873@googlegroups.com> <0af38ccd-784d-408e-87ce-6a34c9dc7b5a@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <95daa00e-2297-437d-90ba-ea18b52fea9f@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Rudimentary programming methodology |
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
Den torsdag 13 juni 2019 kl. 13:10:20 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den torsdag 13 juni 2019 kl. 13:01:26 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > Den torsdag 13 juni 2019 kl. 12:48:45 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > Den torsdag 13 juni 2019 kl. 12:36:51 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > > Den torsdag 13 juni 2019 kl. 12:24:42 UTC+2 skrev Evertjan.:
> > > > > =?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_Th=C3=B6rnvall?= <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 13
> > > > > Jun 2019 in comp.lang.javascript:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Well Arno Evertjan claimed that javscript switch is just a fancy layout
> > > > > > and doing if else if in background. So it is just a reading aid for
> > > > > > code.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, you should not try to read between the lines.
> > > > >
> > > > > A switch DOES the same in the background as a if-then-else construct does,
> > > > > but IS NOT the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can easily measure any timing improvement by setting up a test script.
> > > > >
> > > > > > But maybe he was just trying to pull a joke upon me.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the first sensible idea you have,
> > > > > you should always be prepared for that.
> > > > >
> > > > > After all, forgetting the sex thing, there is only one thing more enjoyable
> > > > > than discussing by arguments, and that is exchanging jokes.
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: the discussion being more educational.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Evertjan.
> > > > > The Netherlands.
> > > > > (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
> > > >
> > > > Well you make me confused Evertjan is there a sequential case evaluation until break, or is case basicly a function call to the appropriate case?
> > > >
> > > > If it is not, why does not javascript have a construct more like this pseudocode where Case basicly a variable assigned to hold a function call?
> > > >
> > > > Case A {do this}
> > > > Case B {do that}
> > > > Case C {do something else}
> > > >
> > > > If switch=A {Case:A)} else if switch=B {Case:B)}elseif switch=C {Case:C}
> > > >
> > > > start process
> > > > do Case;
> > > > end process
> > >
> > > This syntax would probably be more suitable for javascript.
> > >
> > > Case(A) {do this}
> > > Case(B) {do that}
> > > Case(C) {do something else}
> > >
> > > If (switch==A) {x=A)} else if (switch==B) {x=B)} elseif (switch==C) {x=C}
> > >
> > >
> > > setTimeout(function(){Case(x);}, 300);
> > >
> > > Well i know that x is normally a function parameter, and there is no syntax appropriate but since Case probably a reserved word i see no problem with it.
> > >
> > > I think it is rather beautiful in its simplicity?
> >
> > Well maybe you lke this syntax better.
> >
> > Case:A {do this}
> > Case:B {do that}
> > Case:C {do something else}
> >
> > If (switch==A) {x=A)} else if (switch==B) {x=B)} elseif (switch==C) {x=C}
> >
> >
> > setTimeout(function(){Case:(x);}, 300)
>
> And for the anal retentive i suggest
>
> Case:"A" {do this}
> Case:"B" {do that}
> Case:"C" {do something else}
>
> If (switch==A) {x="A")} else if (switch==B) {x="B")} elseif (switch==C) {x="C"}
>
>
> setTimeout(function(){Case:(x);}, 300)
Could i ask why does it work like it does today "as an overlay", and not like real switches?
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-12 14:40 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-06-12 23:54 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-12 23:41 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-13 11:27 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-12 23:56 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 00:49 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 00:57 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-13 11:31 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:19 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:21 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:26 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-13 13:43 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-13 11:29 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:13 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-06-13 12:24 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:36 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:48 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 03:56 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 04:01 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 04:03 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 04:10 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-13 04:14 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-13 13:45 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-06-15 13:49 +0200
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-15 06:31 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-06-15 07:40 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-15 08:25 -0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2019-06-13 15:13 +0700
Re: Rudimentary programming methodology dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-06-13 04:20 -0700
csiph-web