Re: An "if" without "if"

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: An "if" without "if"
Date	Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:07:51 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	44
Message-ID	<87y45j6nm0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References	<if-20160602002158@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <nintrv$2uc$1@news.albasani.net> <nip29s$r1a$1@news.albasani.net> <nl9lap$sco$1@dont-email.me> <course-20160703072154@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="017616aa25f81ec581c44d76d61ba2f3"; logging-data="24174"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jtO+Zgc+LTRWlqxHXHhWpwxcLbYexRa4="
Cancel-Lock	sha1:jEEHobNmO5yVOAUwWEVhmv9vRmA= sha1:E1+yqizGHgjGsTxbhiruX2xiKTE=
X-BSB-Auth	1.b0fd704900e823a01156.20160703110751BST.87y45j6nm0.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30814

Show key headers only | View raw

ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:

> Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> writes:
>>Stefan Weiss wrote:
>>>I have some doubts about the wisdom of introducing arrow functions and
>>>default arguments to a class before covering basics like if-else
>>>branching, but there may be a valid reason for this. 
>>Another very interesting work which proceeds the same way is Reg 
>>Braithwaite's _JavaScript AllongÃ©_, either the original edition [1] or 
>>the ES6 one [2].
>
>   In the meantime, my course has finished, and I have learned
>   that for the goal of my beginner's course, which is to learn
>   event handling with JavaScript, I do not need neither
>   parameters nor default values nor the keyword »function«,
>   so, in the next course, I'll just explain parameterless
>   arrows only. For example, I'll explain
>
> ()=> 1
>
>   and slightly later I'll explain blocks, like, for example, in
>
> f = ()=> { console.log( "a" ); return 3; }
>
>   . Then, near the end of the short (18 hours) course,
>   I can show code like the following:
>
> onClick = () => span.classList.toggle( "off" );
>
> span = window.document.getElementById( "number" );
>
> window.document.getElementById( "brackets" ).
> addEventListener( "click", onClick );

Avoiding parameters seems like an odd choice:

  window.document.getElementById( "brackets" ).
  addEventListener( "click",
      (span => {return () => span.classList.toggle( "off" );})(
          window.document.getElementById( "number" ))
  );

-- 
Ben.

Thread

Re: An "if" without "if" andber93@web.de - 2016-06-02 02:16 +0200
  Re: An "if" without "if" Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:37 +0200
    Re: An "if" without "if" Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-07-03 00:13 +0000
      Re: An "if" without "if" Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-03 11:07 +0100
      Re: An "if" without "if" "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-07-03 10:29 -0700
        Re: An "if" without "if" Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-07-04 01:08 +0000
      Re: An "if" without "if" John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-07-04 14:49 +0100

csiph-web