Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #41098
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? |
| Date | Sat, 15 Oct 2022 01:52:47 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <87v8oloqlc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <31753076-4806-4dd3-8577-40a4ed23b57dn@googlegroups.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8e1c2f508dc719b9b49d4fb1f451084c"; logging-data="2473769"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ma4d+EgBCDrzVBzrS1d5tH3BpZukBt58=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:L/U5kPcF8Fk4xlR3BEi3pVm3utU= sha1:TABe6kd00lh5e6MzxvkVSVxrRW0= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.94dad69309211c63b216.20221015015247BST.87v8oloqlc.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:41098 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> writes: > Welcome to Node.js v18.9.0. > >> 1889**29 > 1.0250068783051206e+95 >> Number(BigInt(1889)**BigInt(29)) > 1.0250068783051207e+95 You question (in the subject) was "Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms?" If you once considered them a can of worms, why might you not consider them so now? And what has your example got to do with the question? -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2022-10-14 15:52 -0700
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-10-15 01:52 +0100
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-10-15 09:33 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-10-15 10:00 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2022-10-15 11:13 +0100
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-10-15 13:43 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2022-10-15 15:56 +0100
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-10-15 17:44 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2022-10-15 14:25 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-10-15 16:31 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2022-10-15 16:22 +0100
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-10-15 17:04 +0100
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2022-10-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2022-10-15 18:51 +0200
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2022-10-22 14:35 -0700
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 09:02 -0800
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-17 02:00 -0700
Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms? Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 07:40 -0700
csiph-web