Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33473
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: x === x |
| Date | Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:45:32 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <87shjjvn2b.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <JavaScript-20170530123255@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <874lw231ui.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <context-20170530144535@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <2872662.aeNJFYEL58@PointedEars.de> <87inkh28sf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <19437984.EfDdHjke4D@PointedEars.de> <87efv4zr3k.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2276977.Lt9SDvczpP@PointedEars.de> <87k24wy1pw.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <dab78138-0ac1-453d-b147-131b9892da04@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b8cfcc8b3b6248419b3e2a0831823cf6"; logging-data="29728"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18aCeZFpAp74mzDeliaFT7bQ7dHE4GX834=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:ndHIazlbXjfZSNYal1WF/op53vA= sha1:WTNkxM3PMitUA3AqrbpnHbnrI50= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.2035cbf4e28f295cb860.20170601144532BST.87shjjvn2b.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:33473 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
> On Thursday, 1 June 2017 02:46:08 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> I am reasonably sure that ECMAScript syntax is not ambiguous (at least
>> on this matter).
>
> You just don't know shit, certainly on this matter.
On this matter specifically (the interpretation of { at the start of an
ExpressionStatement), the syntax appears to be very clear and
unambiguous.
Can you give an example of a Script (or Module) where the syntax permits
more than one valid parse? That would clarify what you consider to be
"the syntax". Presumably you are discounting, as syntax, one or more of
the rules that I consider to part of it.
Alternatively you could be rude again, and I'll know not to try to
understand your position.
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-30 14:34 +0100
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-30 15:02 +0100
Re: x === x Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-30 16:22 +0200
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-31 01:02 +0100
Re: x === x Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-31 12:39 +0200
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-31 21:52 +0100
Re: x === x Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-31 23:39 +0200
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-06-01 01:46 +0100
Re: x === x Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-06-01 00:14 -0700
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-01 10:39 +0100
Re: x === x Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-06-01 03:37 -0700
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-01 18:54 +0100
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-06-01 21:54 +0100
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-02 11:06 +0100
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-02 11:08 +0100
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-02 10:56 +0100
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-06-04 12:50 +0100
Re: x === x John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-06-04 14:30 +0100
Re: x === x Dr J R Stockton <J.R.Stockton@physics.org> - 2017-06-04 09:03 -0700
Re: x === x Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-06-01 14:45 +0100
Re: x === x Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-06-01 07:00 -0700
Re: x === x Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-06-01 00:00 -0700
csiph-web