Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33389
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: JavaScript code security |
| Date | Wed, 24 May 2017 14:28:47 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <87r2zetmcw.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <58a53166-53fb-4974-9264-d73f26a0a549@googlegroups.com> <9817aa91-22fd-4064-980c-c872fe530dd3@googlegroups.com> <cb7fe530-be69-4666-a229-2bfb420d4855@googlegroups.com> <87poezuiyc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <ac0124ee-ead4-4bc9-91a8-c0d8cb16d673@googlegroups.com> <XnsA77F5D895B25Aeejj99@194.109.6.166> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="95aa184a244c61a799406b3927b6d4cb"; logging-data="10113"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX188yaH0XTX5Dw3yTFbdC6vRURQ2gqBt6E0=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:wVGpNZs1ukT4Rr9iRwtqQLCosVU= sha1:vQymzH46vRC78zqZMqgVYi7gC08= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.f6fe2425785f5a44e41a.20170524142847BST.87r2zetmcw.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:33389 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> writes: > justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> wrote on 24 May 2017 in > comp.lang.javascript: > >>> The bottom line is that client-side scripting can't do any serious >>> validation. Use it to improve the user experience, not to protect your >>> data integrity. >>> >> "Certainly", could you show me an example? > > Wrong Q. > > "An" example of code that "can't do" something is nonsense. You cut too much context. justaguy quoted "certainly" because I'd stated that something can certainly be done (circumvent client-side data validation) and he was asking for an example of that. The thread seems to have moved now so no need for one, I think. <snip> -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 13:02 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 13:11 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 17:56 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-24 02:44 +0100
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 19:06 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-24 09:11 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 05:56 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-05-29 14:57 -0400
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-30 09:41 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-23 10:53 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-06-23 13:38 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-24 14:28 +0100
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-24 18:07 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 06:01 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-05-24 14:19 +0100
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 10:01 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-24 19:18 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 11:39 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-24 23:07 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 14:26 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-05-25 16:26 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-24 01:12 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 17:15 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 04:14 +0200
Re: JavaScript code security justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 19:47 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security Myers <xdaamanx@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 07:54 -0700
Re: JavaScript code security Myers <xdaamanx@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 07:55 -0700
csiph-web