Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29200
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated |
| Date | Sun, 10 Jan 2016 01:38:56 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 52 |
| Message-ID | <87fuy6xlfz.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <f2b66424-2df1-4db9-9b23-a8fa8a3822c1@googlegroups.com> <1f898f71-c031-4d09-982b-65e8a117dde6@googlegroups.com> <2d038517-e626-4952-83a8-04be16278fd2@googlegroups.com> <0e4b03c5-f76b-4736-8227-c744d25af653@googlegroups.com> <n6r8n8$fcl$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA58AB0B40E8Feejj99@194.109.6.166> <n6rcge$3ea$2@dont-email.me> <XnsA58AE5D29C4A2eejj99@194.109.6.166> <87r3hqxw37.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <XnsA58AED9E760CCeejj99@194.109.6.166> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="017616aa25f81ec581c44d76d61ba2f3"; logging-data="18579"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sOlAI+vCMwzJy+WyMuoyEGC6yB7eCCT8=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:kxxYUHpQTR2+Erv4W988c7uzMj8= sha1:A03MB0QIwF/Bhf0FTrYfb/ZUjTw= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.a94238ac5dff22cf082c.20160110013856GMT.87fuy6xlfz.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29200 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> writes: > Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote on 09 Jan 2016 in > comp.lang.javascript: > >> "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> writes: >> >>> Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> wrote on 09 Jan 2016 in >>> comp.lang.javascript: >>> >>>> On 09/01/16 13:22, Evertjan. wrote: >>>>> Aleksandro wrote on 09 Jan 2016 in comp.lang.javascript: >>>>> >>>>>> I'd say that blog post lacks way too many examples >>>>> [..] to be called anything close to documentation >>>>> >>>>> How can something "lack too many"? >>>> >>>> Too many more are needed, makes sense? >>> >>> No. >>> >>> Would you perhaps mean "never enough"? >> >> Aleksandro phrase looks fine to me. It's informal and colloquial >> English but idiomatic and clear (to me of course -- obviously not to >> all). It's quite a common turn of phrase. > > So "lack too many" means "never enough"? No, not to me. I can't put it into the sentence and get anything that makes the same sense to me. The closest I can get is "that blog post never has enough examples...", but "never" needs a plurality or range, more like "those blog posts never have enough examples..." or maybe, at a pinch, "that post, from start to finish, never has enough examples...". > Ofcourse I can guess what Alexandro means, > but playing the devils advocate: > what is so clear about it? I don't know. I know it is clear (to me) but not what makes it so. I am not a linguist. > I don't like this guessing in a conversation, > I prefer asking. Absolutely. Best to ask if you are unsure. I'm just adding a data point -- for at least one native speaker, the meaning was clear. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javascript Object Extensions Updated Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-01-07 14:29 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-07 14:45 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-07 21:37 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-07 17:43 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-07 18:03 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-01-09 05:54 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-01-09 06:12 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-09 12:27 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-09 17:22 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-09 13:31 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-09 13:31 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-09 19:06 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-09 23:21 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-10 01:38 +0000
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-10 11:26 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-10 13:32 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-10 20:04 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-10 20:39 +0100
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-10 17:09 -0300
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Simon Blackwell <syblackwell@anywhichway.com> - 2016-01-09 14:01 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-09 16:19 -0800
Re: Javascript Object Extensions Updated Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-09 21:49 -0300
csiph-web