Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29841

Re: Compact connected regular graphs

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Compact connected regular graphs
Date Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:36:58 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 31
Message-ID <877fhf9qt1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References <89a552fe-de77-4ee6-9668-0d68b3ae8c49@googlegroups.com> <e68c7d7d-0088-4be2-b38e-c7975a4e7d7b@googlegroups.com> <8760wzbr8g.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2504274.A2rVV2bxqN@PointedEars.de> <87io0z9wpc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <6245935.oTeRRdmPx9@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="017616aa25f81ec581c44d76d61ba2f3"; logging-data="4687"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+x4PmIH+JTOyAHIrqp4E0fuFVU1RfAGrY="
Cancel-Lock sha1:XJ3FcyWrIEFM5vdVkzIvXczc8Tc= sha1:ViH2FSPPM2xTP+9odNkEVPUz/28=
X-BSB-Auth 1.78e9a9b9904fbaff2a84.20160306223659GMT.877fhf9qt1.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29841

Show key headers only | View raw

How about top posting with a full quote -- will that do it?

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>> 
>> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
>> kill-file?
>
> Yes.  However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles 
> of other people as well.  I do not think that you are *that* stupid.
>
>> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
>> are maybe too long?
>
> The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit 
> the “From” address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly 
> exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which 
> would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
> Which of course is what my saying “attribution *line*, _not_ attribution 
> novel” is all about.
>
>> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?
>
> That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Compact connected regular graphs jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 02:43 -0800
  Re: Compact connected regular graphs jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 05:44 -0800
    Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 14:44 +0000
      Re: Compact connected regular graphs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 19:21 +0100
        Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 20:29 +0000
          Re: Compact connected regular graphs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 23:21 +0100
            Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 22:36 +0000
              Re: Compact connected regular graphs "Mr. Stefan Weiss" <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:48 +0100
        Re: Compact connected regular graphs John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-07 14:04 +0000
  Re: Compact connected regular graphs "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@no-spam.ws> - 2016-03-06 12:41 -0800

csiph-web