Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32825
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? |
| Date | Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:33:44 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 69 |
| Message-ID | <871strpg5j.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <c2c625c3-edf6-440a-8460-73d8e3d5c287@googlegroups.com> <87h92srvjd.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <6e364c21-1307-449c-afe1-6c5de62763c6@googlegroups.com> <08927503-fc48-4ab2-835f-21a1d0904e9b@googlegroups.com> <87h92psfkr.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <b1217b03-6f5f-4bde-a5a0-614f7d6117a4@googlegroups.com> <878to0qlgx.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <40b0b1df-ba67-4f60-aed4-b66aa822dbe8@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d89d34ec3a18d521da67b90c06200a06"; logging-data="31387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX188WGM2KXlYRzJUqX0Jtn3JwX1o87eu8BE=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:6eKCxwveM/6SrgugAMPR8z0a4k4= sha1:F4EjfbTO4lrSWZh2RdJSFa/Y7pI= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.9c8e44ac3b85877c8cef.20170321013344GMT.871strpg5j.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:32825 |
Show key headers only | View raw
justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> writes: > On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 6:41:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> justaguy writes: >> >> > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 6:53:34 AM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> <snip> >> >> Sure, but the idea is that the browser will simply suggest possible >> >> items from the list when the user types. Support for this is not >> >> universal, of course. >> > >> > Quick update. I tried it with Chrome (ver 56) and Firefox (ver 52). >> > And I pass the selected value to a js function for further process >> > with Event of "onInput", both seems to work. So far Chrome hasn't >> > crashed but FF just crashed. Fyi, it's not my js function's problem, >> > several persons including myself has been testing it for about a week, >> > browser never crashed. >> >> What does "crash" mean in this case? > > Browser: FF (ver 52) > Err msg: > " > Gah. Your tab just crashed. > > We can help you! > > Choose Restore This Tab to reload page content. > ... > " > > Condition: > I changed the event from onInput to onSelect. I then changed it back, > however, it still exhibited the same behavior (maybe because of > cache). Today, I changed it to onSelect, expectedly it crashed again, > I changed it back to onInput but it did not crash this time. > >> >> > It raised concern in me if HTML5 "list" INPUT attribute is ready for >> > production... >> >> Does it go wrong when there are no scripts at all? > > Well. I have a few js functions. But as mentioned in my previous, > these functions have been working perfectly fine for some time. > Hence, they are not likely the culprit. I suspect that list attributes have worked perfectly for some time too (I've used them a lot and not seen an issues so far) so this is not a compelling argument. The reason to remove the scripts is to get the smallest error case you can. >>If not, why do you >> think it's the list attribute? If it does, have you filed a bug? This >> would be a significant help to the community. > Do we still need to file a bug? I'd argue that nothing should cause that message to appear so it's a bug one way or another, but if it's due to using nothing but the list attribute then it's a very important one. If your test case involves a complex document with lots of scripts, it's going to take much more effort to track down than a small test case. It would be helpful if you can gradually reduce the complexity of the document until you get as small a test case as you can that still triggers the crash. I know this is non-trivial, but it helps everyone. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:09 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 01:27 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 01:48 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-03-17 15:29 +0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-17 14:00 +0100
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 21:27 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 21:03 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-17 11:29 +0000
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 21:25 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 21:32 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-19 10:53 +0000
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 18:13 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 18:49 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-20 11:03 +0100
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:16 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-22 09:12 +0100
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:51 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-24 09:15 +0100
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-20 10:41 +0000
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 17:23 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-21 01:33 +0000
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:09 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-17 20:11 +0800
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 21:26 -0700
Re: Alternative and fast option to some very useful jQuery features? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-19 17:39 +0800
csiph-web