Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32015
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 19:26 -0800 |
| References | (3 earlier) <o3plbj$68l$1@dont-email.me> <f1c3ec7c-e96e-4ed4-9ccf-eae176233dbc@googlegroups.com> <o3q352$vku$1@dont-email.me> <6407f674-1ad1-4935-8a59-2bb8538c823d@googlegroups.com> <o3s7qh$d83$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <8350738e-4877-4398-b43d-37dc28ec7ea0@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? |
| From | David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> |
On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 6:08:31 PM UTC-5, $Bill wrote: > On 12-26-16 04:50, David Mark wrote: > > On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 10:36:35 PM UTC-5, $Bill wrote: > >> On 12-25-16 16:21, David Mark wrote: > >>> On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 6:41:05 PM UTC-5, $Bill wrote: > >>> > >>>> I wrote a JSON parser in Perl using RE's and parsing out tokens which I then used > >>>> to create a Perl hash duplicating the JSON object - not that difficult code-wise > >>>> (maybe 500-600 lines including blanks), but haven't really checked the efficiency > >>>> of it. > >>> > >>> How about the accuracy? In other words, I agree with Stefan Ram's assessment (though his post is oddly absent here on Google Groups). > >> > >> The accuracy is as good as your code. > ^^^^ > > > How very interesting! Was that a specific benchmark you aimed for or did it just turn out that way? BTW, which of my code is it as good as? > > 'your' meaning the generic coder (which in the above case was 'my' JSON parser not 'yours'). :) You seem to be pointing to "as good" in your bit that I quoted. Regardless, it was a very odd thing to say. Of course the accuracy of your code is down to... your code. :) Guess it will remain a mystery as to how accurate it might be. But if it is based on regular expressions, my guess (and previous implication) is that it will have problems.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-12-24 16:15 +0000
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-12-25 18:01 +0700
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-12-25 15:40 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 16:21 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-12-25 19:36 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 04:50 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-12-26 15:08 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 19:26 -0800
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-12-26 23:19 +0700
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-12-26 23:30 +0700
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-12-26 16:27 +0000
Re: Simply displaying JSON data for users: what is your preferred method? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-12-26 12:36 -0800
csiph-web