Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #27042
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-15 00:08 -0700 |
| References | <f9fe170d-9fdf-42bf-9fca-23a3bc48f76c@googlegroups.com> <p2i9gahbovhj16tmp5t5cgoac0ssfpgt7e@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <6b6d69d8-e5ee-4a03-8ad1-bf3a5202cd25@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. |
| From | jonas.thornvall@gmail.com |
Den söndag 15 mars 2015 kl. 00:51:35 UTC+1 skrev Dr....@nyc.rr.com: > On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 04:15:24 -0700 (PDT), jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote > in <f9fe170d-9fdf-42bf-9fca-23a3bc48f76c@googlegroups.com>: > > >I just wrote a big numb addition function this morning, it is a bit silly and naive, not pure string not pure integer. I think it is correct, but i may have missed leading last digit. > > > >Suggestions to write it shorter and more clear, but keeping the naive approach appreciated. > <snip> > > There are zillions of things to play with doing this. :) > > The first thing that comes to mind is what was on the back cover of grade > school notebooks since before The War (that's WWII) -- tables. More > precisely addition and multiplication tables. Simply two dimensional > arrays to give the sum or product of the two digits. (Actually they went > up to 12 by 12.) Rather than doing your addition just look up the sum and > carry. > > And stop your laughing -- this was the method that was used in BCD machines > a half century ago! In one computer I used, those tables were in regular > memory and I reset them to do octal arithmetic instead of decimal. > > It would make more sense to make sure your strings are all numeric before > you start rather than during the calculation. Actually i was more in favor for skipping using the built in math operators all together, just doing string manipulations but that would required a table. And i am unsure how well such approach would have coped with changing base doing addition. I think i basicly only need exchange 10 with a variable that it a parameter that passed at function call to change base for the addition. You only have to add for the > number of digits of the shorter string and then add the carry to the left > portion of the longer one and concatenate. Alternatively, you can left pad > the shorter one with zeros to make them the same length. That what you do > when you add manually (when learning). > > Also, pad the longer one first with a 0 and then the last carry is not > special. > > Have fun. > > K
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 04:15 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 04:40 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 04:56 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-14 13:41 +0000
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 10:17 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-14 19:39 +0000
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-14 20:56 +0100
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 01:52 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 02:57 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 03:07 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 10:57 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 03:40 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-15 11:06 +0000
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 04:09 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. Dr.Kral@nyc.rr.com - 2015-03-14 19:51 -0400
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 23:57 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 00:08 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-15 10:46 +0000
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 04:12 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 06:00 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 04:27 -0700
Re: Bignumb addition function, suggestion improvements. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 05:30 -0700
csiph-web