Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20463
| Date | 2013-06-27 11:58 +1000 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem |
| References | (1 earlier) <b2tp34F7ci0U1@mid.individual.net> <kqcvjv$3j3$5@dont-email.me> <b2ug29Fcg88U1@mid.individual.net> <-NSdna7ha-8Yi1fMnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d@westnet.com.au> <b31corF17ekU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <6KadnUDKkJGuAVbMnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> (permalink) |
On 27/06/2013 9:45 AM, Mel Smith wrote: > Andrew said: > > >> If you intend to give away someone else's content for free then why do you >> want to continue to make a claim on it (how can you even make a claim on >> it)? > > I make no claim on it at all, I'm siumply reading it and re-formatting > it for ease of use -- and its public info asnd publically available at many > other locations. Then why do you want to obfuscate it if not to reinforce some claim to it? >> Do the websites you subscribe to know that you have been 'lapping up' >> their content for redistribution? >> > They provide their content freely to everyone. and they will be > provided with *my* database shortly -- for free So your answer to my question is "no". >> Why do you assume that people are waiting to on-sell the content you are >> 'lapping up'? > > I don't 'assume' it -- I'm just wary that it might occur. If you didn't assume that people would why do you guard against it? >> 1.4K+ row tables sound ridiculous, as far as usability is concerned. > > Another judgement from you with insufficient knowledge for same. I said that they *sound* ridiculous not that they *are* ridiculous. If each table row was 22 pixels high that equates to a table that's over 30,000 pixels high. Andrew Poulos
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javascript Obfuscator problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-24 15:12 -0600
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 00:40 +0200
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-25 08:51 -0600
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 20:46 +0000
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-25 15:23 -0600
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-06-26 08:15 +1000
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-26 17:45 -0600
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-06-27 11:58 +1000
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-27 09:10 -0600
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-06-27 20:49 +0200
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-27 21:38 +0200
Re: Javascript Obfuscator problem "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-06-25 10:45 +0200
csiph-web