Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #25510

Re: Arithmetic compression.

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Date 2014-07-22 04:53 -0700
References <a75b8873-9178-4c08-96d1-b911f9ad9ba1@googlegroups.com> <ovvtml1uz0t1.chpfsm2tqo39$.dlg@40tude.net> <0a07b248-1bfa-49bb-8cb1-ba0b11f6d2e0@googlegroups.com> <MPG.2e3814b1a945fa3f98a7ff@news.newsguy.com>
Message-ID <68638008-158d-477c-9115-b947c2e11ec3@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Arithmetic compression.
From jonas.thornvall@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

Den tisdagen den 22:e juli 2014 kl. 13:27:37 UTC+2 skrev J. Clarke:
> In article <0a07b248-1bfa-49bb-8cb1-ba0b11f6d2e0@googlegroups.com>, 
> 
> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com says...
> 
> > 
> 
> > Den tisdagen den 22:e juli 2014 kl. 00:01:50 UTC+2 skrev JJ:
> 
> > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:26:27 -0700 (PDT), jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > > Encoding binary numbers into base-2 zeroless encoding save digit places why isn't it used is there disadvantages doing arithmetic in zeroless bases? 27 = 1 1 0 1 1 = 2 2 1 1
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > > The actual numbers in example is of course just symbols we could encode it to 1100? And with a bijective zeroless encoder decode it would still decode to 27.
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > > I have a much stronger compressed encoding in mind, if is just implement it correct it will be mindblowing.. I hope this get thru i am not always that clear, presenting my problems.
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > Shouldn't that be: 1 1 0 1 1 = 2 2 1 2 2 ?
> 
> > 
> 
> > "2*8=16"+"2*4=8"+"1*2=2"+"1*1=1" no it seem correct?
> 
> 
> 
> Then represent 26 in your system without using a zero.

2122 = 2*8 + 1*4 + 2*2 + 1*2 = 26 
Please look at the script.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-21 13:26 -0700
  Re: Arithmetic compression. JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2014-07-22 05:01 +0700
    Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-21 15:44 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net> - 2014-07-22 07:27 -0400
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 04:53 -0700
    Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-21 16:20 -0700
    Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-21 16:22 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-21 23:17 -0700
  Re: Arithmetic compression. John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-07-22 09:07 +0100
    Re: Arithmetic compression. Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 11:58 +0200
      Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 05:12 -0700
    Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 04:49 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-07-22 15:53 +0100
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 08:17 -0700
          Re: Arithmetic compression. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-22 17:00 +0100
  Re: Arithmetic compression. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 08:08 -0700
    Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 08:29 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 08:48 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-22 17:07 +0100
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 09:17 -0700
          Re: Arithmetic compression. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-22 17:24 +0100
            Re: Arithmetic compression. Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 22:12 +0200
              Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 16:24 -0700
              Re: Arithmetic compression. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-23 00:39 +0100
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 09:25 -0700
          Re: Arithmetic compression. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-22 17:30 +0100
            Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 10:45 -0700
            Re: Arithmetic compression. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-07-23 02:08 +0200
              Re: Arithmetic compression. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 17:20 -0700
                Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 18:19 -0700
      Re: Arithmetic compression. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 11:11 -0700
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 11:56 -0700
        Re: Arithmetic compression. John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-07-23 16:15 +0100
      Re: Arithmetic compression. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-07-22 19:14 +0100
        Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 11:57 -0700
          Re: Arithmetic compression. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-07-22 21:32 +0100
            Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 16:27 -0700
            Re: Arithmetic compression. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-07-22 16:29 -0700
  Re: Arithmetic compression. Dave Brown <0ntariokingston@gmail.com> - 2015-05-07 05:32 -0700

csiph-web