Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30782

Re: Should I use JQuery?

X-Received by 10.157.30.195 with SMTP id n61mr19119643otn.34.1467063775696; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received by 10.157.37.28 with SMTP id k28mr772570otb.18.1467063775652; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!jk6no4522574igb.0!news-out.google.com!d62ni680ith.0!nntp.google.com!jk6no4522567igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Date Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <1c60c17e-6c1f-428e-8681-60224d193e5d@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.106.62.102; posting-account=hYRygAoAAABkmvJVmPilz9Q1TOjgPQAq
NNTP-Posting-Host 24.106.62.102
References <nkmft2$th$1@dont-email.me> <db298b28-cea8-468d-a0ea-78ab71b11c01@googlegroups.com> <d6584683-5600-4353-b519-91ee84d3d705@googlegroups.com> <XnsA63381CE05096eejj99@194.109.6.166> <fee111a4-c243-46c1-9979-b794db2bacaa@googlegroups.com> <1c60c17e-6c1f-428e-8681-60224d193e5d@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent G2/1.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Message-ID <45eeff3f-013a-456e-b554-d8d3e9d86c8a@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Should I use JQuery?
From "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Injection-Date Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:42:55 +0000
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30782

Show key headers only | View raw

On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 12:21:43 PM UTC-5, Ram Tobolski wrote:
> I still find rehab from jQuery difficult, when it comes to DOM queries and manipulation. It is just so elegant. And vanilla js is still not quite there. Even angular.js contains a subset of jQuery (jqlite).

Please quote who and what you are replying to. Not everyone uses Google Groups or an interface that hold onto discussion context.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Should I use JQuery? wmgill <wmgill@domain.invalid> - 2016-06-25 13:43 -0400
  Re: Should I use JQuery? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-25 20:17 +0200
    Re: Should I use JQuery? wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:12 -0400
      Re: Should I use JQuery? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-01 13:57 -0700
  Re: Should I use JQuery? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-25 11:38 -0700
    Re: Should I use JQuery? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Should I use JQuery? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-06-26 12:45 +0200
        Re: Should I use JQuery? Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 10:00 -0700
          Re: Should I use JQuery? Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 10:21 -0700
            Re: Should I use JQuery? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-27 14:42 -0700
              Re: Should I use JQuery? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-06-28 12:03 +0200
      Re: Should I use JQuery? wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:34 -0400

csiph-web