Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12679

Re: Criticism Please

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From Web Interface Tricks <webinterfacetricks@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Criticism Please
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization http://groups.google.com
Lines 35
Message-ID <3767258.3018.1331694735683.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcql4> (permalink)
References <d046ff93-7e9b-4617-b2dd-1ebd2eb726c7@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> <09a04fed-7c31-402a-9a09-b9c1432ef91a@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host 175.39.10.50
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace posting.google.com 1331694859 14111 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2012 03:14:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To <09a04fed-7c31-402a-9a09-b9c1432ef91a@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=175.39.10.50; posting-account=xOeY_woAAABal4Z83a26ZXNCdu8ESP1_
User-Agent G2/1.0
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:12679

Show key headers only | View raw


On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:07:55 PM UTC+11, David Mark wrote:
> On Mar 13, 8:36 pm, Web Interface Tricks
> <webinterfacetri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't know how useful this would be, but I'm trying to make a
> > javascript program for rapidly designing page layouts; the theory
> > being it would give people more time worrying about content instead.
> >
> > I'm interested in anyone's criticism of the idea or the execution (or
> > both), if you have a minute to spare.
> 
> Briefly, why are the checkboxes to the right of their labels in a LTR
> document? 

I guess I'm used to seeing forms with descriptions on the left and inputs on the right, both on paper and on the web, but I accept those are usually text fields not checkboxes.

> That always looks weird. 

Ok I will test it the other way and see how it looks.

> And why is everything in pixel
> units?

Three main reasons. 
1 I'm used to using pixels and find them predictable and consistent.
2 I noticed most web-pages these days have a central column of about 900-1000 pixels, in the centre of the window, so that was the first setting I included.
3 Then I made everything else in pixels for consistency, and for reason 1.

But I'm open to suggestions. How do you prefer to think of sizes when formatting various page elements?

Thanks for your feedback.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Criticism Please Web Interface Tricks <webinterfacetricks@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 17:36 -0700
  Re: Criticism Please David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 18:07 -0700
    Re: Criticism Please Web Interface Tricks <webinterfacetricks@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 20:12 -0700
      Re: Criticism Please David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 20:47 -0700
  Re: Criticism Please Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-14 18:23 +1100
    Re: Criticism Please Web Interface Tricks <webinterfacetricks@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 05:20 -0700
  Re: Criticism Please Dr J R Stockton <reply1211@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-03-15 22:31 +0000

csiph-web