Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #9500

Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Message-ID <2709012.iQuTKuoKCy@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:30:08 +0100
User-Agent KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
Subject Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction?
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <6567149.685.1324401412063.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbo42> <1658658.tIHn9WeWv6@PointedEars.de> <snEcS0D9Zh8OFwV4@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript
MIME-Version 1.0
Lines 25
NNTP-Posting-Date 21 Dec 2011 20:30:08 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host db4361e4.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace DXC=`Q]nm0EcUV0NTD<CL>55K=A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;IAON^PBnRU7DZm8W4\YJN<;?f@h5gMfb<dY906Ve2E67\ZXLP[ZdXT5
X-Complaints-To usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:9500

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show key headers only | View raw


John G Harris wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 at 22:02:23, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>storm.mark@gmail.com wrote:
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>Please put your real name there.  In Google Groups, if you absolutely must
>>use it (see below), by "subscribing" to the newsgroup.
>   <snip>
> 
> If you have a copy of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland burn it
> IMMEDIATELY! Lewis Carroll was not the author's real name!!!
> 
> In other words, Ears is being silly.

I will leave it to the dedicated reader to decide from the content of our 
postings who of the both of us acts sillier here.


PointedEars
-- 
var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = (
    navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1
    && navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1
)  // Plone, register_function.js:16

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? storm.mark@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 09:16 -0800
  Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-20 22:02 +0100
    Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? storm.mark@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:27 -0800
      Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-21 13:42 +0100
    Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-21 17:25 +0000
      Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-21 20:30 +0100
        Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-22 15:22 +0000

csiph-web