Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #9500
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Message-ID | <2709012.iQuTKuoKCy@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:30:08 +0100 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Subject | Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <6567149.685.1324401412063.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbo42> <1658658.tIHn9WeWv6@PointedEars.de> <snEcS0D9Zh8OFwV4@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 21 Dec 2011 20:30:08 CET |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | db4361e4.newsspool2.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=`Q]nm0EcUV0NTD<CL>55K=A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;IAON^PBnRU7DZm8W4\YJN<;?f@h5gMfb<dY906Ve2E67\ZXLP[ZdXT5 |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:9500 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Show key headers only | View raw
John G Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 at 22:02:23, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>storm.mark@gmail.com wrote:
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>Please put your real name there. In Google Groups, if you absolutely must
>>use it (see below), by "subscribing" to the newsgroup.
> <snip>
>
> If you have a copy of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland burn it
> IMMEDIATELY! Lewis Carroll was not the author's real name!!!
>
> In other words, Ears is being silly.
I will leave it to the dedicated reader to decide from the content of our
postings who of the both of us acts sillier here.
PointedEars
--
var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = (
navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1
&& navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1
) // Plone, register_function.js:16
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? storm.mark@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 09:16 -0800
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-20 22:02 +0100
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? storm.mark@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:27 -0800
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-21 13:42 +0100
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-21 17:25 +0000
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-12-21 20:30 +0100
Re: Is this the only way to unit-test an events abstraction? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-22 15:22 +0000
csiph-web