Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #27254
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. |
| Date | Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:31:07 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <2436927.QxtA20KIfX@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <e7563f81-a11d-4d56-a61a-c0c84f966c3e@googlegroups.com> <mg456a$2sr$4@dont-email.me> <mg47u5$9q8$1@solani.org> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1428535991 30652 eJwNyMERACEIA8CWBEOUciQM/Zdwt8+NTaMOGERMzBMNwxDkVxd2ylXeaqXnw/oL2o2ezFX5ASGhETI= (8 Apr 2015 23:33:11 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:33:11 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXKpYi5wDO/09Y4ltLE5SL/vzxEw8yiWobU0Ee9TF1xBsv7NZdUz1phjBHJ1YPDjfD6gc2KBSU |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:s98IJCE0m/oDKbvyrG7rULUZmb4= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXaoFOzhGR/09YEqal+7lCHhOzyHY0nrystnfyjqEKARwN8x1V6lWT2/MHFVkQ7w== |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:27254 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Christoph M. Becker wrote: > Denis McMahon wrote: >> I haven't tested the following code, but it might return a result object >> that either contains the results you want, garbage, or a single error >> attribute. > > <snip> > >> Sorry it's not a class object, but I've never really grokked the whole >> emulate OOP with javascript using functions as classes thing[1]. > > It appears that the function can be used as constructor function No, it cannot. It is syntactically invalid to begin with. > and called with `new election([...])`, so all is well. ;) It is a fundamental misconception that OOP requires classes. You do _not_ emulate OOP using functions as constructors in most ECMAScript implementations; you *do* OOP, just a special kind of prototype-based OOP. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. Rahul Reddy <rahulreddy160@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 10:44 -0700
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-04-08 22:49 +0200
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 21:05 +0000
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-04-08 23:52 +0200
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-04-09 01:31 +0200
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-04-09 16:31 +0200
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Javascript classes. Please take a look at my question. John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2015-04-09 09:24 +0100
csiph-web