Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #33887

Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.100.225.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM
Date Sun, 27 Aug 2017 03:02:01 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines 93
Message-ID <2423280.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <7e54d58e-0ce6-4bb5-9f07-f65b69a94a64@googlegroups.com> <5846bd55-f0bd-4088-a596-aba50eef32a5@googlegroups.com> <DOM-insertation-20170819210612@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <11843581.uLZWGnKmhe@PointedEars.de> <onc4cc$2mkt$1@csiph.com> <7340100.T7Z3S40VBb@PointedEars.de> <oncp61$2o9$1@csiph.com> <19530051.EfDdHjke4D@PointedEars.de> <ondujg$rus$1@csiph.com> <6718455.EvYhyI6sBW@PointedEars.de> <onetvb$1gto$1@csiph.com> <3126118.iIbC2pHGDl@PointedEars.de> <onf6h2$1mrv$1@csiph.com> <8133365.CDJkKcVGEf@PointedEars.de> <onr7pm$ppa$1@csiph.com>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8Bit
Injection-Info gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="100.225.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.225.100"; logging-data="5429"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org"
User-Agent KNode/4.14.2
X-Face %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face 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
X-User-ID U2FsdGVkX1+sGbOe3Efaa8OFhF5xmkxtQ/80Z5hBGuYvotbJ36f0EA==
Cancel-Lock sha1:6yKm104s4uZgjSnxjvRY7qUxJAY=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:33887

Show key headers only | View raw


Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> On 21/08/2017 22:16, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>> On 21/08/2017 17:47, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>>>> On 21/08/2017 16:44, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>>>>>> I am sure that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> const par = document.createElement( 'p' );
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> will always create HTML element. I can't see any real scenario where
>>>>>>> createElement method will return "something else than a reference to
>>>>>>> an object that has a method named “appendChild”" in that particular
>>>>>>> scenario.
>>>>>> Why?
>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/createElement
>>>>> […]
>>>> Certainly you can come up with something better than hearsay.
>>> Possibly there is a better explanation than just hearsay.
>> Possibly.  Can you come up with it?
> 
> No. I was expecting you'll do that.

That is precisely your fallacy here.  He who makes a claim carries the 
burden of proof to support it; not others carry the burden of proof to 
refute the same claim or prove the opposite claim.

>> This is not about not feature-testing the createElement() method.  It is
>> about testing its return value before using that.
> 
> Got it, but still I claim that in that particular case I would not test
> it.

It does not matter what you claim.  It matters on what kind of reasoning you 
are basing your (design) decisions.
 
>>> I might be wrong, but if there are cases that may strongly require "if"
>>> here then I'd like to know.
>> 
>> You are trying to shift the burden of proof again.  You have claimed that
>> this method can never return something unsuitable.  So how do *you*
>> support that claim *other* than with hearsay from MDN (I called it
>> “hearsay” because it is a wiki and there is no other reference attached
>> to your claim)?
>> You have claimed that this method can never return something unsuitable.
> 
> Let me clarify it: it may return something unexpected, but I've never
> tested return value from createElement method before I use it because 1)
> it was always working as expected and 2) I haven't got any scenario
> where I could say it's required.

That is precisely the problem.  Your decisions are apparently based only on 
wishful thinking.
 
>> So, what if no exception is being thrown by a method, would you not want
>> to make sure as best as you can that the return value of a method is
>> actually a reference to an object, before you attempt to access its
>> properties?
> 
> Generally yes, but as for the returns from createElement method I do not
> do that.

Not being based on sound reasoning, your decision-making process is not 
logical.
 
>>> and unless it's not modified it has been always working quite good.
>> Based on what *data*?
> 
> Own experience.

Do you realize that one’s experience is limited?
 
> I'd rather strongly urge to give me a scenarios where createElement
> method returns something different than created HTML element. I'd like
> to understand why do I need to test a return value of createElement
> method if it's actually a reference to an object, before I attempt to
> access to it's properties.

You are trying to shift the burden of proof again.  I am not playing that 
game.

Also, please trim your quotes from now on.

.
.
.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2017-08-19 12:35 -0700
  Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2017-08-19 12:55 -0700
    Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-20 12:16 +0200
      Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 15:55 +0200
        Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-20 19:18 +0200
          Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 21:50 +0200
            Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-20 22:39 +0200
              Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-21 08:29 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-21 16:44 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-21 17:24 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-21 17:47 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-21 19:50 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-21 22:16 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 09:25 +0200
                Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-27 03:02 +0200
  Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-20 12:30 +0200
  Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2017-08-20 07:37 -0700
    Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-08-20 17:17 +0200
    Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-08-20 17:48 +0100
  Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2017-08-20 11:21 -0700
    Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-08-20 19:29 +0100
    Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-08-21 01:29 +0200
      Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-21 16:29 +1000
        Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-08-21 12:25 +0200
        Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-21 16:47 +0200

csiph-web