Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #98915

Hashing Download

Show all headers | View raw

<div>Digital megabreaches have lately become so commonplace as to be almost indistinguishable on the alarm scale---a hundred million passwords stolen from one social media service one day, a few hundred million more the next. It all becomes a depressing blur. But not all password disasters are equally disastrous. And the difference between a Three Mile Island and a Hiroshima sometimes comes down to an arcane branch of cryptography: hashing.</div><div></div><div></div><div>TL;DR Hash is both a noun and a verb. Hashing is the act of converting passwords into unreadable strings of characters that are designed to be impossible to convert back, known as hashes. Some hashing schemes are more easily cracked than others.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>hashing download</div><div></div><div>Download File: https://t.co/diuCFIC9e5 </div><div></div><div></div><div>Multiplicative hashing is a simple type of hash function often used by teachers introducing students to hash tables. Multiplicative hash functions are simple and fast, but have higher collision rates in hash tables than more sophisticated hash functions.</div><div></div><div></div><div>To measure that I wrote a small program that takes a hash , and runs it through Fibonacci hashing to get a slot in the hash table . Then I change a single bit in , giving me , and after I run that through Fibonacci hashing I get a slot . Then I measure depending on which bit I changed in , which bits are likely to change in compared to and which bits are unlikely to change.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Why does Fibonacci hashing not work as a hash function alone? It should, unless you have a use case that results in lots of Fibonacci numbers being inserted. You can use the identity function as the hash when you use Fibonacci hashing to assign a hash to an index. In fact you can also use the identity function when using prime number sizes. Only for power of two sizes and for fastrange do you need a separate hash function. Or when your type is bigger than 64 bits obviously.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I think it is possible to improve fastrange so that it also uses the low bits, but why not just use Fibonacci hashing? To improve fastrange you would have to slow it down. Fibonacci hashing is already the same speed and gives better results.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The brotli code actually has some of the properties they were looking for when searching out this number as well as referencing some heuristic of which they ran tests in order to optimize this for. Interesting you can see this number popping up in a number of open sourced google tools that need extremely fast hashing (snappy, brotli, webp).</div><div></div><div></div><div>Since Fibonacci multiples have essentially random values for the lower bits, I wonder if you can break up any remaining ill conditioned patterns by XOR-ing the result of the multiplication with the input value itself. Intuitively, it should combine the strong hashing power of the multiplication with the excellent spreading you would otherwise see for a Fibonacci pattern mapped 1:1 in a power of 2 sized table.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Only if you disregard rounding, I believe. The beauty of Fibonacci hashing is that with incrementing inputs, the output will always fall in the largest open interval (ie. as far as possible from any earlier element).</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Hello Malte! Thank you for the very informative post and for bringing up much interesting discussions. It turns out the technique is the the same as the once used in the Linux kernel for hashing pointer address values since 2016:</div><div></div><div></div><div>I'm doing a password manager for a school project and I need to hash the master password for verification but I also need to write the hashing algorithm myself. However, most the algorithms I've come across are very complicated (except for MD5 but that's overly insecure).Are there any slightly simpler hashing alogorithms which won't take too long to write and implement without libraries? (I'm using c#).</div><div></div><div></div><div>Balloon hashing is nearly as simple to implement as PBKDF2 and is a memory-hard password hash (like Argon2 or scrypt). Balloon is also specifically recommended as a memory-hard password hash in the latest revision of NIST SP-800-63B so that might net some extra consideration from your instructors if this is an applied crypto class. (Dealing with compliance and standards is an important part of real-world cryptography practice).</div><div></div><div></div><div>So MD5 would be fine if it was secure? The reason MD5 is considered insecure is because it is highly vulnerable to collision attacks, which involve creating two differing inputs that have the same hash. The only attack that would be relevant to password hashing is a preimage attack, and MD5 is not vulnerable to these. So why is MD5 (and even SHA-1 and SHA-2) not safe to use to hash passwords? Simple: It's too fast. A fast GPU can try literally billions of candidate passwords per second.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Luckily for you, it is possible to slow down MD5! There are several different constructions which can do this, the most popular being PBKDF2. However there are even more simple constructions. The S2K KDF from the OpenPGP standard is by far one of the most simple password hashing algorithms which uses a fast hash. All it involves is passing a repetition of the password and a salt through the fast hash function until several tens or hundreds of megabytes have been processed.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Despite rapid developments in single cell sequencing, sample-specific batch effects, detection of cell multiplets, and experimental costs remain outstanding challenges. Here, we introduce Cell Hashing, where oligo-tagged antibodies against ubiquitously expressed surface proteins uniquely label cells from distinct samples, which can be subsequently pooled. By sequencing these tags alongside the cellular transcriptome, we can assign each cell to its original sample, robustly identify cross-sample multiplets, and "super-load" commercial droplet-based systems for significant cost reduction. We validate our approach using a complementary genetic approach and demonstrate how hashing can generalize the benefits of single cell multiplexing to diverse samples and experimental designs.</div><div></div><div></div><div>It is said that what happens on the internet stays on the internet, forever. In some cases this may be considered a feature. Reports of human rights violations and corporate corruption, for example, should remain part of the public record. In other cases, however, digital immortality may be considered less desirable. Most would agree that terror-related content, child sexual abuse material, non-consensual intimate imagery, and dangerous disinformation, to name a few, should not be so easily found online. Neither human moderation nor artificial intelligence is currently able to contend with the spread of harmful content. Perceptual hashing has emerged as a powerful technology to limit the redistribution of multimedia content (including audio, images, and video). We review how this technology works, its advantages and disadvantages, and how it has been deployed on small- to large-scale platforms.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Bloom filters are a lovely application of hashing that cannot be done simplyusing Object.hashCode(). Briefly, Bloom filters are a probabilistic datastructure, allowing you to test if an object is definitely not in the filter,or was probably added to the Bloom filter. TheWikipedia page is fairlycomprehensive, and we recommendthis tutorial.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Our hashing library has a built-in Bloom filter implementation, which requiresonly that you implement a Funnel to decompose your type into primitive types.You can obtain a fresh BloomFilter with create(Funnel funnel, int expectedInsertions, double falsePositiveProbability), or just accept thedefault false probability of 3%. BloomFilter offers the methods boolean mightContain(T) and void put(T), which are self-explanatory enough.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Does this means that hashing always fails, and is never a good way to scrub data? Almost, but not quite. There are more advanced uses of hashing that can offer some protection in some settings. But the casual assumption that hashing is sufficient to anonymize data is risky at best, and usually wrong.</div><div></div><div></div><div>While hashing PII of fixed length like an SSN or a phone # may not render it anonymous, do you agree that hashing an email address of variable length could come close to anonymity due to the number of permutations?</div><div></div><div></div><div>In previous sections we were able to make improvements in our searchalgorithms by taking advantage of information about where items arestored in the collection with respect to one another. For example, byknowing that a list was ordered, we could search in logarithmic timeusing a binary search. In this section we will attempt to go one stepfurther by building a data structure that can be searched in\(O(1)\) time. This concept is referred to as hashing.</div><div></div><div></div><div>You may be able to think of a number of additional ways to compute hashvalues for items in a collection. The important thing to remember isthat the hash function has to be efficient so that it does not becomethe dominant part of the storage and search process. If the hashfunction is too complex, then it becomes more work to compute the slotname than it would be to simply do a basic sequential or binary searchas described earlier. This would quickly defeat the purpose of hashing.</div><div></div><div></div><div>We now return to the problem of collisions. When two items hash to thesame slot, we must have a systematic method for placing the second itemin the hash table. This process is called collision resolution. Aswe stated earlier, if the hash function is perfect, collisions willnever occur. However, since this is often not possible, collisionresolution becomes a very important part of hashing.</div><div></div><div></div><div>A disadvantage to linear probing is the tendency for clustering;items become clustered in the table. This means that if many collisionsoccur at the same hash value, a number of surrounding slots will befilled by the linear probing resolution. This will have an impact onother items that are being inserted, as we saw when we tried to add theitem 20 above. A cluster of values hashing to 0 had to be skipped tofinally find an open position. This cluster is shown inFigure 9.</div><div></div><div></div><div>When we want to search for an item, we use the hash function to generatethe slot where it should reside. Since each slot holds a collection, weuse a searching technique to decide whether the item is present. Theadvantage is that on the average there are likely to be many fewer itemsin each slot, so the search is perhaps more efficient. We will look atthe analysis for hashing at the end of this section.</div><div></div><div> df19127ead</div>

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hashing Download Stephen Newcomb <newcombstephen5@gmail.com> - 2024-01-21 02:51 -0800

csiph-web