Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #24352

Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted

From Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted
Date 2014-05-22 18:46 +0100
Message-ID <220520141846543294%timstreater@greenbee.net> (permalink)
References <8eb3b763-31e1-47b3-9d26-5acbc8662216@googlegroups.com> <+qXJxDObKodTFwb+@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <ee22e470-d76e-4edd-aece-4886b6e031a1@googlegroups.com> <2e1d2869-3f46-4912-88fd-a1b779ce7a44@googlegroups.com> <ilT+yWmBTNfTFw4N@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <ilT+yWmBTNfTFw4N@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>, Dr J
R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> ISO 8601 should be used for human-readable dates.  For why, read ISO
> 8601.

Err, no thanks.

-- 
"People don't buy Microsoft for quality, they buy it for compatibility
with what Bob in accounting bought last year. Trace it back - they buy
Microsoft because the IBM Selectric didn't suck much" - P Seebach, afc

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted garrett.smith@acxiom.com - 2014-05-14 09:59 -0700
  Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:15 +0100
    Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-05-15 21:31 +0200
      Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 12:53 -0700
        Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 13:12 -0700
        Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-05-15 22:21 +0200
          Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-05-16 00:44 +0200
            Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-05-16 01:26 +0200
              Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-05-16 09:39 +0200
                bitwise vs. logical OR operator (was: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-05-16 12:50 +0200
                Re: bitwise vs. logical OR operator (was: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted) dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 11:21 -0700
  Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-16 22:26 +0100
    Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-19 11:56 -0700
      Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-19 17:03 -0700
        Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-21 17:30 +0100
          Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-22 10:20 +0100
            Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-23 20:44 +0100
              Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-24 15:54 +0100
          Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-22 18:46 +0100
            Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-25 22:18 -0700
              Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-26 11:41 +0100
                Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-28 09:54 -0700
          Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 10:37 -0700
            Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-05-24 19:09 +0100
  Re: ISO 8601 Code Review Wanted dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 13:14 -0700

csiph-web